bug#63249: [404] broken link

2023-05-03 Thread Pádraig Brady

On 03/05/2023 14:17, Adrien Kara via GNU coreutils Bug Reports wrote:

Hi Gnu team,

The link on https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/ section 'Enhancement 
Requests' for rejected feature requests are broken.
Target: https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/rejected_requests.html


There was an issue in the recent mirroring operation
to update the latest released manual.

I've now restored the missing files.

Marking this as done.

thank you,
Pádraig






bug#63245: Potential regression: cp --preserve=mode or --preserve=all fails to copy files from subdirectory

2023-05-03 Thread Pádraig Brady

On 03/05/2023 18:45, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:

Hi Pádraig,

Wow, nice! That was really quick!

how would this patch get into the affected distros as a bugfix? Then it would 
actually help me as I can't ship a patched coreutils with ReaR.


I expect the process would be something like:

1. merge this change to upstream coreutils (probably tomorrow).
2. apply this change to debian bookworm
   I'd also apply this related patch to bookworm:
   https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/commit/b54da709a.patch
3. propagate those changes to ubuntu lunar

cheers,
Pádraig





bug#63249: [404] broken link

2023-05-03 Thread Adrien Kara via GNU coreutils Bug Reports
Hi Gnu team,

The link on https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/ section 'Enhancement 
Requests' for rejected feature requests are broken.
Target: https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/rejected_requests.html

Regards,
Adrien.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


bug#63245: Potential regression: cp --preserve=mode or --preserve=all fails to copy files from subdirectory

2023-05-03 Thread Schlomo Schapiro
Hi Pádraig,

Wow, nice! That was really quick!

how would this patch get into the affected distros as a bugfix? Then it
would actually help me as I can't ship a patched coreutils with ReaR.

Kind regards,
Schlomo

On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 18:40, Pádraig Brady  wrote:

> On 03/05/2023 10:27, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm a maintainer of the Relax-and-Recover (
> https://relax-and-recover.org/)
> > Open Source project and think that I might have found a major regression
> in
> > cp, starting somewhere with version 9.
> >
> > Please see
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/2017414
> > and https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/2972 for how I found out about
> this.
> >
> > Problem:
> >
> > We use a cp call like the following to copy various files and directory
> > into a destination path with preserving the structure:
> >
> > cp --verbose -t DESTINATION -L --preserve=all --parents SOURCE...
> >
> > Over the last 10+ years that worked well on all Linux distros (ReaR is
> > build for and tested on nearly all distros), but I recently found out
> that
> > on Ubuntu 23.04 this fails like this:
> >
> > # rm -Rf /tmp/f && mkdir /tmp/f && cp --verbose -t /tmp/f -L
> --preserve=all
> > --parents /etc/apt/sources.list && echo yes ; ls -lR
> > /tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list
> > /etc/apt/sources.list
> > /etc -> /tmp/f/etc
> > /etc/apt -> /tmp/f/etc/apt
> > '/etc/apt/sources.list' -> '/tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list'
> > cp: ‘etc/apt’: No such file or directory
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2437 Apr 23 09:53 /etc/apt/sources.list
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2437 Apr 23 09:53 /tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list
> > #
> >
> > Ubuntu 23.04 uses cp (GNU coreutils) 9.1
> >
> > On Ubuntu 22.04 there is cp (GNU coreutils) 8.32 and the same example
> works
> > as expected:
> >
> > # rm -Rf /tmp/f && mkdir /tmp/f && cp --verbose -t /tmp/f -L
> --preserve=all
> > --parents /etc/apt/sources.list && echo yes ; ls -lR
> > /tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list
> > /etc -> /tmp/f/etc
> > /etc/apt -> /tmp/f/etc/apt
> > '/etc/apt/sources.list' -> '/tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list'
> > yes
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 263 Mär 26 15:20 /etc/apt/sources.list
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 263 Mär 26 15:20 /tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list
> > #
> >
> > BTW, I checked also on many other distros that ReaR supports and all
> > distros with cp version 9.1 fail in the same way.
> >
> > Can you please have a look and advise how to proceed? We at the ReaR
> > project can of course change our code to use tar for example, but I won't
> > be surprised if other users will also meet this changed behaviour and
> maybe
> > it is indeed a bug.
>
> Looks like a bug indeed.
> The attached patch should address this in coreutils.
> Any deployments of coreutils 9.1-9.3 inclusive would need to apply this.
>
> thanks,
> Pádraig
>


bug#63245: Potential regression: cp --preserve=mode or --preserve=all fails to copy files from subdirectory

2023-05-03 Thread Pádraig Brady

On 03/05/2023 10:27, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:

Hello,

I'm a maintainer of the Relax-and-Recover (https://relax-and-recover.org/)
Open Source project and think that I might have found a major regression in
cp, starting somewhere with version 9.

Please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/2017414
and https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/2972 for how I found out about this.

Problem:

We use a cp call like the following to copy various files and directory
into a destination path with preserving the structure:

cp --verbose -t DESTINATION -L --preserve=all --parents SOURCE...

Over the last 10+ years that worked well on all Linux distros (ReaR is
build for and tested on nearly all distros), but I recently found out that
on Ubuntu 23.04 this fails like this:

# rm -Rf /tmp/f && mkdir /tmp/f && cp --verbose -t /tmp/f -L --preserve=all
--parents /etc/apt/sources.list && echo yes ; ls -lR
/tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list
/etc/apt/sources.list
/etc -> /tmp/f/etc
/etc/apt -> /tmp/f/etc/apt
'/etc/apt/sources.list' -> '/tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list'
cp: ‘etc/apt’: No such file or directory
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2437 Apr 23 09:53 /etc/apt/sources.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2437 Apr 23 09:53 /tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list
#

Ubuntu 23.04 uses cp (GNU coreutils) 9.1

On Ubuntu 22.04 there is cp (GNU coreutils) 8.32 and the same example works
as expected:

# rm -Rf /tmp/f && mkdir /tmp/f && cp --verbose -t /tmp/f -L --preserve=all
--parents /etc/apt/sources.list && echo yes ; ls -lR
/tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list
/etc -> /tmp/f/etc
/etc/apt -> /tmp/f/etc/apt
'/etc/apt/sources.list' -> '/tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list'
yes
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 263 Mär 26 15:20 /etc/apt/sources.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 263 Mär 26 15:20 /tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list
#

BTW, I checked also on many other distros that ReaR supports and all
distros with cp version 9.1 fail in the same way.

Can you please have a look and advise how to proceed? We at the ReaR
project can of course change our code to use tar for example, but I won't
be surprised if other users will also meet this changed behaviour and maybe
it is indeed a bug.


Looks like a bug indeed.
The attached patch should address this in coreutils.
Any deployments of coreutils 9.1-9.3 inclusive would need to apply this.

thanks,
Pádraig
From 8ad4a486fe03203e00f31262cd106e58385da0f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?= 
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 17:01:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] cp: -p --parents: fix failure to preserve permissions for
 absolute paths

* src/cp.c (re_protect): Ensure copy_acl() is passed an absolute path.
* tests/cp/cp-parents.sh: Add a test case.
* NEWS: Mention the bug.
Fixes https://bugs.gnu.org/63245
---
 NEWS   |  4 
 src/cp.c   | 16 +++-
 tests/cp/cp-parents.sh |  6 ++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 3d34a1b3c..9fad8a775 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ GNU coreutils NEWS-*- outline -*-
 
 ** Bug fixes
 
+  cp --parents again succeeds to preserve mode for absolute directories.
+  Previously it would have failed with a "No such file or directory" error.
+  [bug introduced in coreutils-9.1]
+
   cksum again diagnoses read errors in its default CRC32 mode.
   [bug introduced in coreutils-9.0]
 
diff --git a/src/cp.c b/src/cp.c
index 488770a0b..00a5cb813 100644
--- a/src/cp.c
+++ b/src/cp.c
@@ -296,15 +296,19 @@ regular file.\n\
when done.  */
 
 static bool
-re_protect (char const *const_dst_name, int dst_dirfd, char const *dst_relname,
+re_protect (char const *const_dst_name, int dst_dirfd, char const *dst_fullname,
 struct dir_attr *attr_list, const struct cp_options *x)
 {
   struct dir_attr *p;
   char *dst_name;		/* A copy of CONST_DST_NAME we can change. */
-  char *src_name;		/* The source name in 'dst_name'. */
+  char *src_name;		/* The relative source name in 'dst_name'. */
+  char *full_src_name;		/* The full source name in 'dst_name'. */
 
   ASSIGN_STRDUPA (dst_name, const_dst_name);
-  src_name = dst_name + (dst_relname - const_dst_name);
+  full_src_name = dst_name + (dst_fullname - const_dst_name);
+  src_name = full_src_name;
+  while (*src_name == '/')
+src_name++;
 
   for (p = attr_list; p; p = p->next)
 {
@@ -347,7 +351,7 @@ re_protect (char const *const_dst_name, int dst_dirfd, char const *dst_relname,
 
   if (x->preserve_mode)
 {
-  if (copy_acl (src_name, -1, dst_name, -1, p->st.st_mode) != 0)
+  if (copy_acl (full_src_name, -1, dst_name, -1, p->st.st_mode) != 0)
 return false;
 }
   else if (p->restore_mode)
@@ -687,6 +691,7 @@ do_copy (int n_files, char **file, char const *target_directory,
   bool parent_exists = true;  /* True if dir_name (dst_name) exists. */
   struct dir_attr *attr_list;
   char *arg_in_concat = NULL;
+  char 

bug#63245: Potential regression: cp --preserve=mode or --preserve=all fails to copy files from subdirectory

2023-05-03 Thread Schlomo Schapiro
Hello,

I'm a maintainer of the Relax-and-Recover (https://relax-and-recover.org/)
Open Source project and think that I might have found a major regression in
cp, starting somewhere with version 9.

Please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/2017414
and https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/2972 for how I found out about this.

Problem:

We use a cp call like the following to copy various files and directory
into a destination path with preserving the structure:

cp --verbose -t DESTINATION -L --preserve=all --parents SOURCE...

Over the last 10+ years that worked well on all Linux distros (ReaR is
build for and tested on nearly all distros), but I recently found out that
on Ubuntu 23.04 this fails like this:

# rm -Rf /tmp/f && mkdir /tmp/f && cp --verbose -t /tmp/f -L --preserve=all
--parents /etc/apt/sources.list && echo yes ; ls -lR
/tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list
/etc/apt/sources.list
/etc -> /tmp/f/etc
/etc/apt -> /tmp/f/etc/apt
'/etc/apt/sources.list' -> '/tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list'
cp: ‘etc/apt’: No such file or directory
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2437 Apr 23 09:53 /etc/apt/sources.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2437 Apr 23 09:53 /tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list
#

Ubuntu 23.04 uses cp (GNU coreutils) 9.1

On Ubuntu 22.04 there is cp (GNU coreutils) 8.32 and the same example works
as expected:

# rm -Rf /tmp/f && mkdir /tmp/f && cp --verbose -t /tmp/f -L --preserve=all
--parents /etc/apt/sources.list && echo yes ; ls -lR
/tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list
/etc -> /tmp/f/etc
/etc/apt -> /tmp/f/etc/apt
'/etc/apt/sources.list' -> '/tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list'
yes
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 263 Mär 26 15:20 /etc/apt/sources.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 263 Mär 26 15:20 /tmp/f/etc/apt/sources.list
#

BTW, I checked also on many other distros that ReaR supports and all
distros with cp version 9.1 fail in the same way.

Can you please have a look and advise how to proceed? We at the ReaR
project can of course change our code to use tar for example, but I won't
be surprised if other users will also meet this changed behaviour and maybe
it is indeed a bug.

Kind regards,
Schlomo Schapiro