On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 04:13:58PM -0500, Paul Garrett wrote:
Dear GNU.org,
In the new RedHat/Fedora, ls no longer ASCII-betizes, but
alphabetizes, and even ignores leading dots, so dotfiles are mixed in
among other files.
Is this a feature?
Yes it is.
You can control ls' (and other
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:00:40AM +0300, M Atakan G?rkan wrote:
Would it not make more sense for rm to fail completely
if one of the files on the command line is not found? For
example if I intend to delete the file foo1 and type
rm foo 1
and by chance have a file named foo, it will be gone;
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:22:36PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
I don't find the BSD one very useful, who has continuous tractor feed
paper printers these days? :-)
A...
Bzzzzrzzrzrzrzzrzz zrzzrzzrrzzr.
Week.
Bzzzrzzrzzr rzzr zrrzrrrzzrzrrzrzrzz.
error; please apply the attached patch.
Regards,
Thomas
2006-07-20 Thomas Schwinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* src/copy.c (set_author): Correctly access SRC_SB's element ST_AUTHOR.
Index: src/copy.c
===
RCS file: /sources
Hello!
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:58:55PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
[...]
Immediatelly (i.e. especiall that there was no ``long failure period''
like said in the bounce message) after sending the mail I received the
attached bounce. I'm ccing this very email to another email address
Hello!
Before I start digging deeper: can someone imaging offhand why `touch'
broke?
#v+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/coreutils/build $ src/touch foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/coreutils/build $ ls -l foo
-rw-r--r-- 1 thomas users 0 Jan 1 1970 foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/coreutils/build $
Hello!
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:24:19PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Thomas Schwinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#v+
2005-12-05 Andreas Gruenbacher
* src/copy.c [!HAVE_FCHOWN]: Define fchown(...) to -1.
(set_owner, preserve_author): New functions, factored out of copy_reg
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:41:02AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
Thomas Schwinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Before I start digging deeper: can someone imaging offhand why `touch'
broke?
Thanks for the report. Which version of 'touch'? The email didn't
say. Is this CVS coreutils or some
Hello!
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 04:08:44PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
Thomas Schwinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please tell if you (or anyone else, of course) need access to a GNU/Hurd
system.
I'm afraid it's a lot to learn all at once;
That was meant to be a general offer (i.e. in case
Hello!
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 07:28:28PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The command, who
when used with any two arguments like
who am am...
displays the result of who am i.
#v+
$ who --help
Usage: who [OPTION]... [ FILE | ARG1 ARG2 ]
[...]
-monly hostname and user
Hello!
Not an answer to the question, but it might be interesting nevertheless.
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:48:11PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Kartik K. Agaram wrote:
Does POSIX require that coreutils commands use only physical path rather
than pwd to resolve relative paths? When pwd
Hello!
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 05:21:34PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
[...]
+( gdb --version ) gdb.out 21
+if test ! -s gdb.out; then
+ echo $0: can't run gdb. Skipping this test. 12
+ (exit 77); exit 77
+fi
#v+
$ ( nonexistent ) out 21
$ test ! -s out echo can\'t run || echo
Hello!
Please tell me if that has been discussed before -- I couldn't come up
with good search terms to check myself.
Automake section.
I was thinking about the following: when in a package P1 (using Automake)
e.g. C header files are installed via ``make install'', they are
installed
[I added the patch's author, Akim Demaille, to the cc list, as it was not
sure if he's still reading the list.]
Hello!
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 04:21:50PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
Benoit Sigoure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hallo!
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 01:16:22PM +0100, Michael Heinzinger wrote:
sorry dont can write in english
hope i can help
I will translate to English once we figured out what the actual issue is.
Aufruf: uname [OPTION]...
Bestimmte Systeminformationen ausgeben. Ohne OPTION dasselbe wie
[Cced to bug-hurd@gnu.org.]
Hello!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:41:42PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.8+.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.8+.tar.gz.sig
Please build it and run make -k check on a few unusual
systems today or tomorrow and report
Hello!
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:06:53PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Isn't the Hurd also one of the systems that does not have an ARG_MAX
limit?
Correct.
#v+
$ uname -a
GNU flubber 0.3 GNU-Mach 1.3.99/Hurd-0.3 i686-AT386 GNU
$ getconf ARG_MAX
undefined
#v-
[glibc]/manual/process.texi
#v+
[...]
Hello!
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 06:06:29AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
According to Manickam Muthuraman on 11/21/2007 4:47 AM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/HHpred/scop_hmm cat *.hhm scop70_1.72.hhm
{ echo *.hhm | xargs cat; } scop70_1.72.hhm.tmp
I was looking at these two command lines and wondered
Hello!
I'm a bit stumped with this behavior of ``readlink -f'', as it doesn't
match what I had expected.
#v+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp $ mkdir a-long
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp $ touch a-long/f
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp $ ln -s a-long a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp $ readlink -f a/f
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:53:01AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
Thomas Schwinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ readlink -f a/../a/f
$ echo $?
1
...
readlink (GNU coreutils) 5.97
Why doesn't it resolve the latter case just as the previous ones?
Because there are two symbolic links
Hello!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:30:57PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to Jim Meyering on 4/16/2008 2:33 AM:
| This test would fail not only because the built-in mknod
| doesn't support -Z, but because it doesn't know about 'p' pipes.
|
|
21 matches
Mail list logo
