Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My understanding (although IANAL) is that when you assign copyright to
FSF, you, as original author, still retain the right to relicense your
code as you see fit for other uses without involving the FSF. So the fact
that you are willing to relicense
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:17:08PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Hi. Would it be possible to re-license this work to the LGPL, and
merge it with gnulib? I will eventually need SHA-2 in some of my
projects that is using gnulib, and I want the LGPL license. I
contacted FSF earlier to
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:30:51PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
Would it make more sense to have a single sha utility that takes
an argument of which algorithm to use, defaulting to the most
secure, then the user can define wrappers to invoke a non-default
algorithm? For example, 'sha
