Re: ls --group-directories-first -U

2008-02-12 Thread jidanni
JM> +(@option{-U}) disables this option altogether. Looks good. JM> + disable with --sort=none (-U);\n\ Looks bad. One thinks "disable by not using it in the first place". Just word it like the first one above. Yes the options are so complicated that one needs a n-to-the-nth-power grid chart to s

Re: ls --group-directories-first -U

2008-02-12 Thread Bert Wesarg
Hi Jim, have you ever consider my follow-up patch to patch#3596 with the name: ls_--group-directories-first_symlinks_to_dir_are_dirs_too.patch? Thanks. Bert ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bu

Re: ls --group-directories-first -U

2008-02-12 Thread Jim Meyering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > J> Would you *please* consider sending a precise suggestion > Sorry. OK, To both > > man page: >--group-directories-first > group directories before files > > And info page: > `--group-directories-first' > Group all the directories before the fi

Re: ls --group-directories-first -U

2008-02-11 Thread jidanni
J> Would you *please* consider sending a precise suggestion Sorry. OK, To both man page: --group-directories-first group directories before files And info page: `--group-directories-first' Group all the directories before the files and then sort the directories and