Ondřej Vašík [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Documenting in getdate.texi will be enough, because that file is
included by coreutils.texi. Thanks!
Ok, here is amended version of the patch, first two (or less) digits are
considered as hours, TZ correction limit set to +/-24:00,
Jim Meyering wrote:
Documenting in getdate.texi will be enough, because that file is
included by coreutils.texi. Thanks!
Ok, here is amended version of the patch, first two (or less) digits are
considered as hours, TZ correction limit set to +/-24:00, both changes
in behaviour documented in
Hello,
Jim Meyering wrote:
I'm a little leery of this patch, because it makes interpretation
of UTC+dd and UTC-dd dependent on the value of dd. For dd = 14, dd
represents hours. Otherwise, it represents minutes. That would have
to be documented, but seems odd enough that my reflex is to
Ondřej Vašík [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
as discussed with Jim Meyering via IRC, I'm sending changed version of
the patch #3 to the list. This one patch adds range to valid TZ and
handles correctly hours when no minutes are specified (until that patch
is UTC+14 handled incorrectly as
Hello,
as discussed with Jim Meyering via IRC, I'm sending changed version of
the patch #3 to the list. This one patch adds range to valid TZ and
handles correctly hours when no minutes are specified (until that patch
is UTC+14 handled incorrectly as UTC+0:14) and are in common range of
UTC-12 to
Ondřej Vašík [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
From 9eb2711cd03b3825e36cff33e7e7fccbbfc504d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?Ond=C5=99ej=20Va=C5=A1=C3=ADk?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:37:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] *lib/getdate.y: Factorize duplicate code for relative time
Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Would you mind separating that into a few separate change sets?
...
I hope I will do the rest of patches ( 1 or 2 more
are still necessary to cover all the issues I found).
Here is the second set of patches.
First one (getdate_4) addresses issue
Ondřej Vašík [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
From 4c9db16207b5c76bb85b05ee5853c525372bb80a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?Ond=C5=99ej=20Va=C5=A1=C3=ADk?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:32:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] *lib/getdate.y: Do not ignore specified time zone when
Ondřej Vašík [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
...
From 4c9db16207b5c76bb85b05ee5853c525372bb80a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?Ond=C5=99ej=20Va=C5=A1=C3=ADk?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:32:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] *lib/getdate.y: Do not ignore specified
Hello,
while playing a bit with date formats, I found several issues (still
present in GIT head). Current date on my machine is Fri Jun 27 11:58:47
CEST 2008, used in all examples.
1) Strange results of signed relative time offset
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ date -d 11:40 + 60 minutes
Fri Jun 27
Ondřej Vašík [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
while playing a bit with date formats, I found several issues (still
present in GIT head). Current date on my machine is Fri Jun 27 11:58:47
CEST 2008, used in all examples.
1) Strange results of signed relative time offset
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
11 matches
Mail list logo
