Steven Schubiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that the attached patch works, except that the SIZE argument
specified to -B/--block-size parameter doesn't currently make it
into the totals, I'd like to hear some opinions how you would make it
happen (I have some ideas, but I'd certainly
Steven Schubiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the patch. However, I haven't even looked at it because
there's another that's already gone through some review:
Some people from Fujitsu revived a patch by Denis Smit, here:
This is the link I meant
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the patch. However, I haven't even looked at it because
there's another that's already gone through some review:
Some people from Fujitsu revived a patch by Denis Smit, here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.bugs/11955
I
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the link I meant to provide:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.bugs/11965
From a first glance, this looks far more complete than my approach.
Would it be worthwhile to mention such unapplied, yet stalled patches
within the TODO
Steven Schubiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the link I meant to provide:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.bugs/11965
From a first glance, this looks far more complete than my approach.
Would it be worthwhile to mention such
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the patch.
FTR (for the record), a second version which does some magic
to obtain the block-size argument and append it to the output.
I don't think, it'll be of much use now, but archiving doesn't hurt.
Steven Schubiger
diff --git a/src/df.c
Given that the attached patch works, except that the SIZE argument
specified to -B/--block-size parameter doesn't currently make it
into the totals, I'd like to hear some opinions how you would make it
happen (I have some ideas, but I'd certainly prefer to have some peer-
driven effort).
Steven
