tags 12020 notabug
close 12020
stop
(triaging old bugs)
On 21/07/12 04:50 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
[...]
Though I guess it's close enough, only a pitty it's not in the manpage.
So feel free to close this or retarget it.
Closing.
-assaf
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 18:16:39 Jim Meyering wrote:
> Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 22, 2012 14:40:46 Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> When already using --color, we do get each test result for free
> >
> > Not really. The check for file capabilities is optional even with
> > --color.
> > The
Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Sunday, July 22, 2012 14:40:46 Jim Meyering wrote:
>> When already using --color, we do get each test result for free
>
> Not really. The check for file capabilities is optional even with --color.
> The 'ca' indicator in $LS_COLORS needs to be set to a color to enable this.
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 14:40:46 Jim Meyering wrote:
> When already using --color, we do get each test result for free
Not really. The check for file capabilities is optional even with --color.
The 'ca' indicator in $LS_COLORS needs to be set to a color to enable this.
Kamil
Luk Claes wrote:
...
> But it apparently does not show when capabilites are active, could that
> be added (or was that added in the meantime in a subsequent version)?
>
> $ setcap cap_chown+ep foo
>
> $ ls -l foo
> -rw-r--r-- 1 luk luk 5 Jul 22 00:37 foo
>
> $ sudo getcap foo
> foo = cap_chown+ep
On 07/22/2012 12:50 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 07/21/2012 11:56 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> tag 12020 moreinfo
>> thanks
>>
>> On 07/21/2012 12:41 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Currently when using POSIX acls, this is not visible when listing files
>>> with ls. This means that users and system ad
On 07/21/2012 11:56 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> tag 12020 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On 07/21/2012 12:41 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Currently when using POSIX acls, this is not visible when listing files
>> with ls. This means that users and system administrators cannot easily
>> see when (non trivia
tag 12020 moreinfo
thanks
On 07/21/2012 12:41 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Currently when using POSIX acls, this is not visible when listing files
> with ls. This means that users and system administrators cannot easily
> see when (non trivial) POSIX acls are in use which obviously can result
>
Hi
Currently when using POSIX acls, this is not visible when listing files
with ls. This means that users and system administrators cannot easily
see when (non trivial) POSIX acls are in use which obviously can result
in wrong expectations when only seeing the rwx kind of acls.
At a minimum I wou
