On Sun, Sep 2, 2012, at 18:10, Jim Meyering wrote:
Sure, but please s/recognized/accepted/.
Then let it be, as for me accepted means just about
the opposite of ignored. I chose recognized because
'touch' reacts to an option it does not know at all with:
unrecognized option.
$ touch --the bell
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012, at 18:10, Jim Meyering wrote:
Sure, but please s/recognized/accepted/.
Then let it be, as for me accepted means just about
the opposite of ignored. I chose recognized because
'touch' reacts to an option it does not know at all with:
Hi,
Attached two patches slightly improve the help text
and documentation of 'touch'.
Regards,
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service
From 5df770d0e0b1d64d18a1ca0885f334e98e892f35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benno Schulenberg bensb...@justemail.net
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Hi,
Attached two patches slightly improve the help text
and documentation of 'touch'.
Regards,
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service
From 5df770d0e0b1d64d18a1ca0885f334e98e892f35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benno
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012, at 13:54, Jim Meyering wrote:
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
-Ignored; for compatibility with BSD versions of @command{touch}.
+Ignored; recognized for compatibility with BSD versions of @command{touch}.
This seems understandable to me already.
Yes, with a little thought
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012, at 13:54, Jim Meyering wrote:
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
-Ignored; for compatibility with BSD versions of @command{touch}.
+Ignored; recognized for compatibility with BSD versions of
@command{touch}.
This seems understandable to me already.
