On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> ...
>> Hence since c_f_m() can validly fail even with CAN_MISSING,
>> I agree your patch is correct.
>>
>> Please push.
>
> Done.
Hmm... For the record, I also pushed (accidentally) two
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
> Hence since c_f_m() can validly fail even with CAN_MISSING,
> I agree your patch is correct.
>
> Please push.
Done.
On 03/14/2014 03:44 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> Interesting. So canonicalize_filename_mode() can fail in this case,
>> even with CAN_MISSING. It's unexpected that c_f_m() sets errno=ENOENT
>> when CAN_MISSING is set. I wonder should we change
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 03/14/2014 01:42 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> From a6d2db8b6dfe15344aba4aefe9545eb3a4876d45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jim Meyering
>> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:05:04 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] ln: with -sr, don't segfault for a TARGE
On 03/14/2014 01:42 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> From a6d2db8b6dfe15344aba4aefe9545eb3a4876d45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering
> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:05:04 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] ln: with -sr, don't segfault for a TARGET of ''
>
> Prior to this change, "ln -sr '' F" would segfau
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Erik Bernstein wrote:
> Package: coreutils
> Version: 8.21-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> when ln is run with --relative --symbolic and and empty string as the
> target, it ungracefully dies with a segmentation fault. The memory
> violation appears to happen in s
