On 10/28/2015 11:00 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Reopened until someone else votes.
I'm 50:50 regarding the usefulness of --verbose.
Writing "killed PRG after N seconds elapsed" sounds like a useful
message, yet I'm afraid that then other requests may follow soon
which may really bloat the code,
Am 26.10.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Pádraig Brady:
> On 26/10/15 18:35, Thomas Güttler wrote:
>> Am 26.10.2015 um 16:51 schrieb Pádraig Brady:
>>> On 26/10/15 14:26, Thomas Güttler wrote:
Am 26.10.2015 um 12:44 schrieb Pádraig Brady:
>
> I've not sure there is enough distinct
reopen 21760
On 28/10/15 07:16, Thomas Güttler wrote:
> Am 26.10.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Pádraig Brady:
>> On 26/10/15 18:35, Thomas Güttler wrote:
>>> Am 26.10.2015 um 16:51 schrieb Pádraig Brady:
On 26/10/15 14:26, Thomas Güttler wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.10.2015 um 12:44 schrieb
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
> >Reopened until someone else votes.
>
> I'm 50:50 regarding the usefulness of --verbose.
> Writing "killed PRG after N seconds elapsed" sounds like a useful
> message, yet I'm afraid that then other requests may follow soon
> which may really bloat
tag 21760 wontfix
close 21760
stop
Thanks for the additional input Jim, Bernhard and Bob.
About commandline tool "timeout": Start COMMAND, and kill it if still running
after DURATION.
A new team mate wasted some time to debug why
a process was killed with signal 15.
I think it would be nice to have an --verbose option, and a some
text which explains why the signal was send.
This
tag 21760 wontfix
close 21760
stop
On 26/10/15 10:30, Thomas Güttler wrote:
> About commandline tool "timeout": Start COMMAND, and kill it if still running
> after DURATION.
>
> A new team mate wasted some time to debug why
> a process was killed with signal 15.
>
> I think it would be nice to
Am 26.10.2015 um 16:51 schrieb Pádraig Brady:
> On 26/10/15 14:26, Thomas Güttler wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 26.10.2015 um 12:44 schrieb Pádraig Brady:
>>>
>>> I've not sure there is enough distinct actions within timeout(1) to warrant
>>> --verbose?
>>> How about doing this in the script?
>>>
>>>
On 26/10/15 14:26, Thomas Güttler wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.10.2015 um 12:44 schrieb Pádraig Brady:
>>
>> I've not sure there is enough distinct actions within timeout(1) to warrant
>> --verbose?
>> How about doing this in the script?
>>
>>timeout 1s ping localhost
>>test $? = 124 && echo {
Am 26.10.2015 um 12:44 schrieb Pádraig Brady:
I've not sure there is enough distinct actions within timeout(1) to warrant
--verbose?
How about doing this in the script?
timeout 1s ping localhost
test $? = 124 && echo { 'ping timed out'; exit 1; }
The issue was already closed with
10 matches
Mail list logo