On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> I see some problems with this followup patch:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/commit/?id=bd4bb42d65aac6591277066739ca42d1ddcc2d0e
>
> in that it will make force-link.c and force-link.h harder to move to gnulib.
> Is there so
On 15/02/17 11:46, Paul Eggert wrote:
> I see some problems with this followup patch:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/commit/?id=bd4bb42d65aac6591277066739ca42d1ddcc2d0e
>
> in that it will make force-link.c and force-link.h harder to move to
> gnulib. Is there some way that w
I see some problems with this followup patch:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/commit/?id=bd4bb42d65aac6591277066739ca42d1ddcc2d0e
in that it will make force-link.c and force-link.h harder to move to
gnulib. Is there some way that we can have the code pass syntax checks
without t