bug#28152: Human readable units (-h/--human-readable vs --si) - Wrong prefix and missing unit

2018-10-29 Thread Assaf Gordon
severity 28152 wishlist tags 28152 wontfix close 28152 stop (triaging old bugs) On 2017-08-21 5:21 p.m., Paul Eggert wrote: On 08/21/2017 03:56 PM, Michael Weiss wrote: Do you think it would be possible to add another variable that wouldn't overwrite the default but use the "human_B" output

bug#28152: Human readable units (-h/--human-readable vs --si) - Wrong prefix and missing unit

2017-08-21 Thread Paul Eggert
On 08/21/2017 03:56 PM, Michael Weiss wrote: Do you think it would be possible to add another variable that wouldn't overwrite the default but use the "human_B" output with -h or --si? Probably not. We've been heading more in the opposite direction, in that we'd rather not have environment

bug#28152: Human readable units (-h/--human-readable vs --si) - Wrong prefix and missing unit

2017-08-21 Thread Michael Weiss
On Sat, 19 Aug, 2017 at 14:09:00 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > I'm afraid the problems would be more than minor, as other programs parse > the output (there's an option in GNU 'sort' to do that, for example). You're right, I was way too optimistic about this. But still, it could be way worse imho.

bug#28152: Human readable units (-h/--human-readable vs --si) - Wrong prefix and missing unit

2017-08-19 Thread Paul Eggert
Michael Weiss wrote: I can understand that changing such historic things might always cause some minor problems I'm afraid the problems would be more than minor, as other programs parse the output (there's an option in GNU 'sort' to do that, for example). That being said, I could be talked

bug#28152: Human readable units (-h/--human-readable vs --si) - Wrong prefix and missing unit

2017-08-19 Thread Michael Weiss
Imho the units used in the output of df, du, ls, etc. with the -h/--human-readable option can be very misleading/ambiguous and in the case of -h/--human-readable even wrong according to standards. I don't want to flame about this but I'd love it if we could discuss this objectively by considering