On 04/02/2020 10:34, Kamil Dudka wrote:
On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 1:45:06 AM CET Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 30/01/2020 13:53, Kamil Dudka wrote:
tests/cp/proc-short-read.sh expects that a pair of subsequent reads from
/proc/kallsyms will always return the same content. This does not seem to
be
On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 1:45:06 AM CET Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 30/01/2020 13:53, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > tests/cp/proc-short-read.sh expects that a pair of subsequent reads from
> > /proc/kallsyms will always return the same content. This does not seem to
> > be a safe assumption any more.
On 30/01/2020 13:53, Kamil Dudka wrote:
tests/cp/proc-short-read.sh expects that a pair of subsequent reads from
/proc/kallsyms will always return the same content. This does not seem to
be a safe assumption any more. The test has started to fail in our build
environment. I am not sure how to
tests/cp/proc-short-read.sh expects that a pair of subsequent reads from
/proc/kallsyms will always return the same content. This does not seem to
be a safe assumption any more. The test has started to fail in our build
environment. I am not sure how to fix the test. We could probably make
it u
