bug#39693: Sv: bug#39693: Any chance of fixing --rfc-3339 to conform to the standard?

2020-02-21 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2/20/20 11:56 PM, Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote: Your statement is in conflict with the message exchange, referenced by the bug I linked to, with, as I understand it, the authors of the standard: Not really. In that email exchange one of the authors of the RFC mentioned a goal of the RFC.

bug#39693: Sv: bug#39693: Any chance of fixing --rfc-3339 to conform to the standard?

2020-02-21 Thread Mads Bondo Dydensborg
Hi again Your statement is in conflict with the message exchange, referenced by the bug I linked to, with, as I understand it, the authors of the standard: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?msg=11;filename=rfc3339+is+the+T+mandatory%3F.eml;att=1;bug=6132 The date-time production in