Jim Meyering wrote:
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
The bad news is that it fail now on ppc in FAIL: misc/sort-float
It's ok now with the patch on ppc.
It's ppc32, not 64 (gcc have --with-long-double-128 option if that matter)
Thanks. Adjusted. I reproduced the failure also on ppc64.
This was
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
The bad news is that it fail now on ppc in FAIL: misc/sort-float
It's ok now with the patch on ppc.
It's ppc32, not 64 (gcc have --with-long-double-128 option if that matter)
Thanks. Adjusted. I reproduced the failure also on ppc64.
Alan Curry wrote:
Jim Meyering writes:
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
Just tested 8.6 on linux glibc-2.11.1/gcc-4.4.5 LFS build on x86, sparc and
ppc
First a good news is that on sparc (32-bits), 8.6 test suite is now passing
I didn't report yet a failure on misc/stty which was
Failure was
Just tested 8.6 on linux glibc-2.11.1/gcc-4.4.5 LFS build on x86, sparc and
ppc
First a good news is that on sparc (32-bits), 8.6 test suite is now passing
I didn't report yet a failure on misc/stty which was
Failure was
+ stty -icanon
stty: standard input: unable to perform all requested
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
Just tested 8.6 on linux glibc-2.11.1/gcc-4.4.5 LFS build on x86, sparc and
ppc
First a good news is that on sparc (32-bits), 8.6 test suite is now passing
I didn't report yet a failure on misc/stty which was
Failure was
+ stty -icanon
stty: standard input: unable
- Original Message -
From: Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net
To: Gilles Espinasse g@free.fr
Cc: 7...@debbugs.gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: bug#7228: coreutils-8.6 sort-float failure on ppc
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
Just tested 8.6 on linux glibc-2.11.1
Jim Meyering writes:
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
Just tested 8.6 on linux glibc-2.11.1/gcc-4.4.5 LFS build on x86, sparc and
ppc
First a good news is that on sparc (32-bits), 8.6 test suite is now passing
I didn't report yet a failure on misc/stty which was
Failure was
+ stty -icanon
