Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Any reason the terminal names aren't sorted in any particular order?
>
> I think the "popular" ones are first, then the rest alphabetized.
> But I'm guessing.
>
>> This fact adds all the more impetus to improving
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any reason the terminal names aren't sorted in any particular order?
I think the "popular" ones are first, then the rest alphabetized.
But I'm guessing.
> This fact adds all the more impetus to improving the info pages to
> describe the dircolors input f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Paul Eggert on 3/26/2005 12:16 AM:
>
> Thanks; I installed the obvious change to src/dircolors.hin.
Any reason the terminal names aren't sorted in any particular order?
>
> I'm not so sure. Such users are not casual, and they can look
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also, for those who prefer British spellings, should we be looking
>> at supporting colour synonyms (dircolours, LS_COLOURS, ls --colour,
>> etc.)?
>
> No, option and environment variable names are American English. If we
> wanted to localize them (I'm dub
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Blake) writes:
> The cygwin terminal supports color, so it would be nice to have this
> patch.
Thanks; I installed the obvious change to src/dircolors.hin.
> Also, I think src/dcgen should not strip comments from
> src/dircolors.hin, so that a user typing `dircolors -p' g
The cygwin terminal supports color, so it would be nice to have this patch.
Also, I think src/dcgen should not strip comments from src/dircolors.hin, so
that a user typing `dircolors -p' gets the comments as well as the default
settings. For example, `info coreutils dircolors' refers to runnin
