Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Nelson H. F. Beebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I suspect that the omission of the nanoseconds values in the
>> timestamps reported by GNU stat is simply an oversight that can be
>> easily rectified, and should be.
>
> Thanks for reporting that. The f
"Nelson H. F. Beebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suspect that the omission of the nanoseconds values in the
> timestamps reported by GNU stat is simply an oversight that can be
> easily rectified, and should be.
Thanks for reporting that. The following patch works for me on Solaris 8.
2004-
"Nelson H. F. Beebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> with this output on SGI IRIX 6.5:
>
> % ls -l --full-time /bin/true
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root sys 312 1999-11-04 12:07:38.887783200 -0700 /bin/true
> % stat /bin/true
...
> Change: 1999-11-04 12:07:38.0 -0700
...
> I s
The GNU coreutils stat command is a nice addition to the Unix
toolbox. However, it seems to have a small deficiency on some
systems.
Compare this output from Red Hat Advanced Server GNU/Linux:
% ls -l --full-time /bin/true
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 19960 2001-07-23 10:53:42.000
