Re: [fuse-discuss] rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-18 Thread Mark Phalan
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 16:25 +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: ... > > ntfs-3g correctly returns ENOTEMPTY but this information gets lost and > arrives as success to gnu rm. > > This indeed looks to be a problem in Solaris. Yup, I agree. Solaris rm(1) has the correct behaviour but using the GNU

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-14 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Andras Barna wrote: > when I execute rm (6.12) -r directory: > > unique: 202, opcode: ACCESS (34), nodeid: 1, insize: 48 > ACCESS / 011 >unique: 202, error: -89 (Operation not applicable), outsize: 16 > unique: 203, opcode: LOOKUP (1), nodeid: 1, insize: 42 > LOOKUP /o >

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-14 Thread Andras Barna
szaka, when I execute rm (6.12) -r directory: unique: 202, opcode: ACCESS (34), nodeid: 1, insize: 48 ACCESS / 011 unique: 202, error: -89 (Operation not applicable), outsize: 16 unique: 203, opcode: LOOKUP (1), nodeid: 1, insize: 42 LOOKUP /o NODEID: 9 unique: 203, error: 0 (Error 0), ou

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-14 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Hi Solaris FUSE Developers, We're back with the GNU rm -rf failing with ntfs-3g on Solaris only. GNU rm on Linux is ok with ntfs-3g. Solaris rm is also ok with ntfs-3g but it works differently. To reproduce the problem: 1. compile the latest coreutils, version 6.12 http://ftp.gnu.org/g

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-14 Thread Jim Meyering
Szabolcs Szakacsits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes: >> "Andras Barna" gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jim Meyering meyering.net> >> > wrote: >> ... >> >> That suggests that the opensolaris ntfs support for unlinkat >> >> doesn't work as do

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-14 Thread Jim Meyering
"Andras Barna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Andras Barna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ... That suggests that the opensolaris ntfs support

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-14 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes: > "Andras Barna" gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jim Meyering meyering.net> wrote: > ... > >> That suggests that the opensolaris ntfs support for unlinkat > >> doesn't work as documented. That unlinkat call is succeeding, > >> yet I pres

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-14 Thread Andras Barna
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Andras Barna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... >>> That suggests that the opensolaris ntfs support for unlinkat >>> doesn't work as documented. Th

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-14 Thread Jim Meyering
"Andras Barna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... >> That suggests that the opensolaris ntfs support for unlinkat >> doesn't work as documented. That unlinkat call is succeeding, >> yet I presume there is a non-empty directory

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-13 Thread Andras Barna
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Andras Barna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: @osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/mkdir -p t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t//t/t///t//t/t/t/ @osol /ntfs: /data/a/bin/rm --version|head -1 rm (GNU coreutils) 6.12 @osol /ntfs: /data/a

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-13 Thread Jim Meyering
"Andras Barna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> @osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/mkdir -p t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t//t/t///t//t/t/t/ >>> @osol /ntfs: /data/a/bin/rm --version|head -1 >>> rm (GNU coreutils) 6.12 >>> @osol /ntfs: /data/a/bin/rm -rf t >>> @osol /ntfs: echo $? >>> 0 >>> @osol /ntfs: ls t >>> t >>> @o

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-11 Thread Andras Barna
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Philip Rowlands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Andras Barna wrote: > >> on opensolaris (update 94) can't remove recursively directories. >> >> @osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/mkdir -p t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t//t/t///t//t/t/t/ >> @osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/rm

Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-11 Thread Philip Rowlands
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Andras Barna wrote: on opensolaris (update 94) can't remove recursively directories. @osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/mkdir -p t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t//t/t///t//t/t/t/ @osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/rm --version|head -1 rm (GNU coreutils) 6.7 @osol /ntfs: rm -rf t rm: cannot remove directo

rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem

2008-08-10 Thread Andras Barna
on opensolaris (update 94) can't remove recursively directories. @osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/mkdir -p t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t/t//t/t///t//t/t/t/ @osol /ntfs: /usr/gnu/bin/rm --version|head -1 rm (GNU coreutils) 6.7 @osol /ntfs: rm -rf t rm: cannot remove directory `t': Directory not empty @osol /ntfs: rm