Re: digest algorithm performance

2005-06-22 Thread Paul Eggert
One more data point: I tweaked my copy of the coreutils code to use asms for the obvious things, in particular, to use the byte-swapping instructions on the x86 instead of the complicated expression involving shifting and masking. The measured performance went down. That is, it took more

Re: Does mv Preserve Hard Links?

2005-06-22 Thread Bob Proulx
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mv /mnt/fs1/dir /mnt/fs2/dir where /mnt/fs[12] are two different ext3 filesystems, /mnt/fs2/dir doesn't exist, and /mnt/fs1/dir contains many thousands of files, several thousand of which are reference by 3 to 6 directory entries compared to the normal 1. [...]

Re: Does mv Preserve Hard Links?

2005-06-22 Thread Jim Meyering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does `mv (coreutils) 5.2.1' preserve hard links? In particular Yes. If you can make it fail to preserve links, please report it with as much detail as possible. Also, you might want to try the latest test release:

Re: perm test and ACLs

2005-06-22 Thread Paul Eggert
Kevin Mudrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Similar to the cp-parents problem I reported yesterday, If this is going to be a recurrent problem, we should package it up as a separate -check file. I installed this; does it work for you? 2005-06-22 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] *

Re: [patch] who and stale utmp entries

2005-06-22 Thread Paul Eggert
Tim Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I had a bug report that 'who -b' and 'who -r' fail to give output with this patch. This fixes it: Thanks for reporting that. IS_USER_PROCESS is already defined in readutmp.h, so I installed this simpler patch in both coreutils and gnulib. 2005-06-22 Paul