Hello,
I did not received any feedback from this request right now. Have you
made any progress on this subject ?
Please let me know the progress for this, or contact me for additional
information if needed.
I'd like to have a ticket link to follow the advancement of this issue
(if possible).
On 19/04/2022 16:00, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 19/04/2022 08:47, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
Hello,
I did not received any feedback from this request right now. Have you
made any progress on this subject ?
Please let me know the progress for this, or contact me for additional
information if needed.
On 19/04/2022 08:47, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
Hello,
I did not received any feedback from this request right now. Have you
made any progress on this subject ?
Please let me know the progress for this, or contact me for additional
information if needed.
I'd like to have a ticket link to follow
When doing mv or cp with --backup=simple, if an existing file in
DIRECTORY has the same name as SOURCE, the files appear to be swapped
instead of an in-place backup of the original file in DIRECTORY being
made.
It doesn't happen with --backup=numbered. SIMPLE_BACKUP_SUFFIX is not set.
Steps to
On 4/18/22 14:47, Ken Ingram wrote:
Making all in .
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/kingram/src/coreutils'
CC lib/libcoreutils_a-randperm.o
lib/randperm.c: In function 'sparse_new':
lib/randperm.c:111:1: error: function might be candidate for attribute
'malloc' if it is known to
