Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good thing I tried to compile before pushing!
The above lacks \n\ on the 0 if OK line.
It's also lacking a close-parenthesis in the text. Also, that wording
is a bit verbose for my taste; the verbosity makes it a
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good thing I tried to compile before pushing!
The above lacks \n\ on the 0 if OK line.
It's also lacking a close-parenthesis in the text. Also, that wording
is a bit verbose for my taste; the verbosity makes it a bit hard to see
the exit-status pattern.
Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good thing I tried to compile before pushing!
The above lacks \n\ on the 0 if OK line.
It's also lacking a close-parenthesis in the text. Also, that wording
is a bit verbose for my taste; the verbosity makes it a
Ondřej Vašík [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as reported in rh bz#446294 , ls is not very clear with it's exit status
documentation. This patch should clarify it a bit.
Re: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.bugs/14764
Thanks, Ondřej. I've reworded things to be more accurate,
mentioned
Hello,
as reported in rh bz#446294 , ls is not very clear with it's exit status
documentation. This patch should clarify it a bit.
Greetings,
Ondřej Vašík
From a3ef5a58f396b53287d7870d2cf35198789240cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?Ond=C5=99ej=20Va=C5=A1=C3=ADk?= [EMAIL
