Re: [PATCH] ls: print "?", not "0" as inode of dereferenced dangling symlink

2009-09-29 Thread Jim Meyering
20:24:41 +0200 Here's a more complete patch, though I still have to add a mention in NEWS about the origin. >From f4d682808c6c8d2e1871278f3e81d0d0766f792b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:24:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ls: print "?", not "

Re: [PATCH] ls: print "?", not "0" as inode of dereferenced dangling symlink

2009-09-28 Thread Pádraig Brady
09 20:24:41 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] ls: print "?", not "0" as inode of dereferenced dangling > symlink > > ls prints inode numbers two ways: for long (-l) listings, > and for short ones, e.g., ls -li and ls -i. The code to print > long listings properly print

[PATCH] ls: print "?", not "0" as inode of dereferenced dangling symlink

2009-09-28 Thread Jim Meyering
Here's another corner-case fix. I'll push something like this as soon as I've updated NEWS and added a test. >From 26a1306a0a9028eceed388dad0d8916aeeb00233 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:24:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ls: print "