Hello,
Jim Meyering wrote:
Ondřej Vašík ova...@redhat.com wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Ondřej Vašík ova...@redhat.com wrote:
What about to split that into two patches? One for SELinux changes and
one for xattr changes (commited after 7.1) - to make it more safe - and
to give other
Ondřej Vašík wrote:
I guess it's time to add the amended cp-a-xattr patch... attached
It is indeed. Thanks!
I've tweaked NEWS as below and eliminated a space/TAB-only hunk in copy.c.
Other than that, I expect to push it very soon -- as soon as make
distcheck completes.
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -35,6
Ondřej Vašík ova...@redhat.com wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Ondřej Vašík ova...@redhat.com wrote:
What about to split that into two patches? One for SELinux changes and
one for xattr changes (commited after 7.1) - to make it more safe - and
to give other distros more time to fix the leak...
Jim Meyering wrote:
When will the libattr fix be in F10?
Upstream report:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00331.html
Talked with Fedora attr maintainer and he will do an update for F-10 and
Rawhide in day or two - upon the upstream reaction. So it should be in
F-10 early next week.
Ondřej Vašík ova...@redhat.com wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
When will the libattr fix be in F10?
Upstream report:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00331.html
Talked with Fedora attr maintainer and he will do an update for F-10 and
Rawhide in day or two - upon the upstream reaction.
Jim Meyering wrote:
Ondřej Vašík ova...@redhat.com wrote:
What about to split that into two patches? One for SELinux changes and
one for xattr changes (commited after 7.1) - to make it more safe - and
to give other distros more time to fix the leak...
That sounds even better. I see that
Ondřej Vašík ova...@redhat.com wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Ondřej Vašík ova...@redhat.com wrote:
What about to split that into two patches? One for SELinux changes and
one for xattr changes (commited after 7.1) - to make it more safe - and
to give other distros more time to fix the leak...
Jim Meyering wrote:
Unfortunately, with this patch, make check fails the cp/link-heap test.
Investigating why, I discovered that it introduces a huge leak into
cp -a, at least on F10. 80MB worth in this case.
I'll let you investigate that one ;-)
Leak is in libattr - added by 2.4.43 (~8
Ondřej Vašík ova...@redhat.com wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Unfortunately, with this patch, make check fails the cp/link-heap test.
Investigating why, I discovered that it introduces a huge leak into
cp -a, at least on F10. 80MB worth in this case.
I'll let you investigate that one ;-)
Leak
Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Hello,
I sent patch about cp -a and it's failure to preserve SELinux context in
October 08.
I missed that.
Meanwhile xattr support was added to cp. As described in
info pages -a option means Preserve as much as possible of the
structure and attributes of the original
10 matches
Mail list logo