Re: exit status of rm

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:45:05PM +, Eric Blake wrote: This puts the invocation of rm without arguments in the implementation's realm, where currently, coreutils is not consistent on what it returns: $ rm rm: missing operand Try `rm --help' for more information. $ echo $? # used

Re: exit status of rm

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Youngman) wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:45:05PM +, Eric Blake wrote: This puts the invocation of rm without arguments in the implementation's realm, where currently, coreutils is not consistent on what it returns: $ rm rm: missing operand Try `rm --help'

Re: exit status of rm

Jim Meyering wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Youngman) wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:45:05PM +, Eric Blake wrote: This puts the invocation of rm without arguments in the implementation's realm, where currently, coreutils is not consistent on what it returns: Without belaboring