On 29/04/2022 00:56, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 4/27/22 09:42, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Marking this as done in the coreutils bug tracker,
now that this is being tracked in glibc.
This could also be worked around Gnulib for the benefit of 32-bit apps
running with unpatched glibc 2.34 and 2.35, or
On 4/27/22 09:42, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Marking this as done in the coreutils bug tracker,
now that this is being tracked in glibc.
This could also be worked around Gnulib for the benefit of 32-bit apps
running with unpatched glibc 2.34 and 2.35, or glibc older than 2.34.
Not sure it's worth
On 27/04/2022 13:42, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Marking this as done in the coreutils bug tracker,
> now that this is being tracked in glibc.
>
> thank you!
>
> On 27/04/2022 13:46, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>>> On 21/04/2022 14:36, Pádraig Brady wrote:
That suggests the kernel
On 26/04/2022 09:44, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
>
> On 21/04/2022 22:59, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 21/04/2022 18:41, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/04/2022 12:25, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 21/04/2022 15:53, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
>
> On 21/04/2022 14:36, Pádraig Brady
Marking this as done in the coreutils bug tracker,
now that this is being tracked in glibc.
thank you!
On 27/04/2022 13:46, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
On 21/04/2022 14:36, Pádraig Brady wrote:
That suggests the kernel (statx) returns fine,
but glibc's fstatat64 is returning the EOVERFLOW.
On 21/04/2022 22:59, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 21/04/2022 18:41, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
On 21/04/2022 12:25, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 21/04/2022 15:53, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
On 21/04/2022 14:36, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 19/04/2022 16:01, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
On 19/04/2022 16:00,
On 21/04/2022 12:25, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 21/04/2022 15:53, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
>>
>> On 21/04/2022 14:36, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> On 19/04/2022 16:01, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
On 19/04/2022 16:00, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 19/04/2022 08:47, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
>>
On 21/04/2022 18:41, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
On 21/04/2022 12:25, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 21/04/2022 15:53, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
On 21/04/2022 14:36, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 19/04/2022 16:01, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
On 19/04/2022 16:00, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 19/04/2022 08:47,
On 21/04/2022 15:53, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
On 21/04/2022 14:36, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 19/04/2022 16:01, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
On 19/04/2022 16:00, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 19/04/2022 08:47, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
Hello,
I did not received any feedback from this request right now.
On 21/04/2022 14:36, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 19/04/2022 16:01, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
On 19/04/2022 16:00, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 19/04/2022 08:47, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
Hello,
I did not received any feedback from this request right now. Have you
made any progress on this subject ?
On 19/04/2022 16:01, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
On 19/04/2022 16:00, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 19/04/2022 08:47, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
Hello,
I did not received any feedback from this request right now. Have you
made any progress on this subject ?
Please let me know the progress for this, or
On 19/04/2022 16:00, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 19/04/2022 08:47, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
Hello,
I did not received any feedback from this request right now. Have you
made any progress on this subject ?
Please let me know the progress for this, or contact me for additional
information if needed.
On 19/04/2022 08:47, Arnaud Panaïotis wrote:
Hello,
I did not received any feedback from this request right now. Have you
made any progress on this subject ?
Please let me know the progress for this, or contact me for additional
information if needed.
I'd like to have a ticket link to follow
Hello,
I did not received any feedback from this request right now. Have you
made any progress on this subject ?
Please let me know the progress for this, or contact me for additional
information if needed.
I'd like to have a ticket link to follow the advancement of this issue
(if possible).
14 matches
Mail list logo
