Re: Feature request/ideas

2005-02-28 Thread Frank Hemer
> |> Also, commitids should be cached at commit time as well as when > |> they are found in RCS files. CVS started doing this on tag > |> creation for other branches and tags a few releases back It's > |> silly to wait for the first update to insert them into val-tags - > |> it only triggers an u

Re: Feature request/ideas

2005-02-28 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Hemer wrote: |> | Ooops, I think I'm too fast;-) I have just finished adding |> '.trunk' | as a trunk-branch substitution, 'cause I happened to |> note that this | fits perfectly into my patch. I have already |> used the above | mentioned splittin

Re: Feature request/ideas

2005-02-28 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Hemer wrote: |>> | If tags with '@' at the begining are used they're added in |>> the | cvsnt way (I remember I wrote cvsnt wouldn't cache them |>> but I was | wrong). If the .commitid is used, they're cached as |>> | '.commitid.xxx', but this co

Re: Feature request/ideas

2005-02-28 Thread Frank Hemer
> > | If tags with '@' at the begining are used they're added in the > > | cvsnt way (I remember I wrote cvsnt wouldn't cache them but I was > > | wrong). If the .commitid is used, they're cached as > > | '.commitid.xxx', but this could be changed as you suggested. > > > > I think this would be a g

Re: failure to append to .cvspass should always be fatal

2005-02-28 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hmmm... I wonder if it is possible to come up with a sanity.sh test case > > for this one? > > I considered it but, dismissed it as infeasible. > Of course, I would be happy to be proved wrong. > > It mig

`cvs up -p FILE' does not detect write failure

2005-02-28 Thread Jim Meyering
Hello, It looks like no version of CVS detects the write failure caused by this sort of command: $ cvs -Q up -p README > /dev/full $ It should do something like this instead: $ ./cvs -Q up -p README > /dev/full cvs [update aborted]: write error: No space left on device [Exit 1] I've

Re: cvs edit error for directories that contain an invalid character

2005-02-28 Thread Larry Jones
David writes: > > I've seen an old issue (#127), related to this error/bug, but it still > happens in the current stable release. > > Has it been forgotten or something? No, it's just a very big job to fix (the entire watch/edit function needs to be redesigned while still remaining backward com

Re: Feature request/ideas

2005-02-28 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Hemer wrote: |> The patch looks pretty good. It's pretty close to what I am |> doing, except I am splitting tags with operators (.word) on the |> `.' and then processing the resulting list an element at a time. |> Thus .prev can be implemented fo

Re: Feature request/ideas

2005-02-28 Thread Frank Hemer
> | Ooops, I think I'm too fast;-) I have just finished adding '.trunk' > | as a trunk-branch substitution, 'cause I happened to note that this > | fits perfectly into my patch. I have already used the above > | mentioned splitting - so now '.prev' might even be added more than > | once and works p

Re: Feature request/ideas

2005-02-28 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Hemer wrote: | On Saturday 26 February 2005 21:06, Derek Price wrote: | |> Frank Hemer wrote: | On Saturday 26 February 2005 00:27, Derek |> Price wrote: |> Frank Hemer wrote: |> I was just glancing at that |> patch and I |> think I can implement

Re: Feature request/ideas

2005-02-28 Thread Frank Hemer
> The patch looks pretty good. It's pretty close to what I am doing, > except I am splitting tags with operators (.word) on the `.' and then > processing the resulting list an element at a time. Thus .prev can be > implemented for each and every revision specification type in a single > location

Re: editors get lost with running an update

2005-02-28 Thread gnu-cvs
Using the diff command is no option, because it uses E responses instead of sending the file content. This causes major troubles with non-ASCII-characters. -- Best regards, Thomas Singer _ smartcvs.com Jim.Hyslop schrieb: Thomas Singer wrote: We've encountered a problem with GNU CVS 1.1

Free SCM Best Practices White Paper

2005-02-28 Thread AccuRev
You're invited to download a free copy of Uttam Narsu's SCM Best Practices white paper courtesy of AccuRev. Uttam Narsu is a former Forrester and GIGA SCM analyst. The white paper has received fabulous feedback and, as a courtesy, we thought it might be of interest to the gnu.cvs.bug community. T

Re: failure to append to .cvspass should always be fatal

2005-02-28 Thread Jim Meyering
> Hmmm... I wonder if it is possible to come up with a sanity.sh test case > for this one? I considered it but, dismissed it as infeasible. Of course, I would be happy to be proved wrong. It might work to use a tool like subterfugue, where you could presumably cause to fail the first write after

RE: editors get lost with running an update

2005-02-28 Thread Jim.Hyslop
Thomas Singer wrote: > We've encountered a problem with GNU CVS 1.12.9. Please see > the following log. [...] > CVSNT 2.0.58d behaves correctly, it keeps the editors information. > > What request SmartCVS should send, so GNU CVS 1.12.9 just > sends the original > content of the file without des

cvs edit error for directories that contain an invalid character (+,>;=\t\n)

2005-02-28 Thread David
Hi, I've seen an old issue (#127), related to this error/bug, but it still happens in the current stable release. Has it been forgotten or something? TIA -- David Santiago [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Bug-cvs mailing list Bug-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/m

Re: failure to append to .cvspass should always be fatal

2005-02-28 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Your patch looks good to me. Go ahead and commit it. > > I've done so on the trunk. > cvs1-11-x-branch too? Yes, that would be good. Hmmm... I wonder if it

Re: failure to append to .cvspass should always be fatal

2005-02-28 Thread Jim Meyering
"Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your patch looks good to me. Go ahead and commit it. I've done so on the trunk. cvs1-11-x-branch too? ___ Bug-cvs mailing list Bug-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs