OpenBSD 3.6 sparc64 stable crash

2005-05-29 Thread Alexander Taler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sun, 29 May 2005 21:02:58 EDT Hi, my nightly testing started generating crashes on saturday morning on the stable branch. The platform is OpenBSD 3.6 sparc64, and the crashes are occuring in run.c. I am including basic debugging information (sanity.

Re: Module "run.c" Interface Standardized - Feature To Stable Branch

2005-05-29 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Conrad T. Pino wrote: >1. Who is able to run the OS/2 feature and stable builds? I don't know. Ocassionally, someone pokes their head in and sends us a patch to get it up and running, but I think it's been at least a year since that has happened.

RE: CVS update [cvs1-11-x-branch]: /ccvs/windows-NT/

2005-05-29 Thread Conrad T. Pino
Hi Derek, > From: Derek Price > > Ah, okay. Sorry. I already forgot that I put this diff bugfix into > stable and didn't read the tag on your commit. I had to make that same > change to the src/run.c on stable when I ported the change from feature. :) The new functions in "windows-NT/run.c"

Re: CVS update [cvs1-11-x-branch]: /ccvs/windows-NT/

2005-05-29 Thread Derek Price
Conrad T. Pino wrote: >Hi Derek, > > > >>From: Derek Price >> >>There is an xnrealloc function in lib/xmalloc.c. Isn't that being >>compiled on Windows? >> >> > >No, stable branch Windows build omits it because it doesn't exist. >My tests (see below) say "lib/xmalloc.c" is on feature branch

RE: CVS update [cvs1-11-x-branch]: /ccvs/windows-NT/

2005-05-29 Thread Conrad T. Pino
Hi Derek, > From: Derek Price > > There is an xnrealloc function in lib/xmalloc.c. Isn't that being > compiled on Windows? No, stable branch Windows build omits it because it doesn't exist. My tests (see below) say "lib/xmalloc.c" is on feature branch only. > Cheers, Ditto, > Derek Conrad