Derek Price wrote: >Derek Price wrote: > > >>>On the other hand, it would be nice if there were a way to specify a >>>default compression level or range of levels (both for the server and >>>the client) that could be used in the absence of any explicit >>>specification by the user. Of course, reconciling conflicting defaults >>>could be an interesting challenge. >>> >>> >>To some extent this would be happening with my proposed change. A >>client that had requested -z9 on a fast machine would always compress >>their data at level 9, but the server would only compress its data at >>whatever maximum level had been set, limiting the load on its CPU. >> >>Similarly for a client -z3 and a server with a min level of 9. The >>client would compress at 3 and the server at 9, saving most the >>bandwidth and not bombing the client CPU. >> >> > > >Hey Larry, > >Can I assume that no comment for almost two weeks means you have no >further objections to this patch going into feature? > >
Since I haven't heard any further objections to this change in several days, I have committed it to feature. Cheers, Derek _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list Bug-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs