Derek Price wrote:
I'm ok with this if you'd like to apply it, Jim.
Patch has been committed on 1.11 branch and on the trunk.
Since this is such a small patch, should I still update ChangeLog and NEWS?
ChangeLog doesn't seem to mention build fixes very much; there are one or
two mentions in
Jim.Hyslop writes:
Since this is such a small patch, should I still update ChangeLog and NEWS?
All changes go into ChangeLog, only significant user-visible changes go
into NEWS. See the GNU coding standards for more details:
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/
-Larry Jones
The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All changes go into ChangeLog, only significant user-visible
changes go
into NEWS. See the GNU coding standards for more details:
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/
Noted. And bookmarked for future reference - thanks for that information.
--
Jim Hyslop
I cannot judge this.
I was just following the example given in
http://cvsweb.NetBSD.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/misc/style?rev=HEADcontent-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
If you think different naming conventions are more appropriate, I don't mind.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear cvs developers,
Georg Schwarz wrote:
I cannot judge this.
I was just following the example given in
http://cvsweb.NetBSD.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/misc/style?rev=H
EADcontent-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
Oh, dear. Time to send NetBSD a note suggesting they change the example, if
they want to remain ISO/ANSI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear cvs developers,
for cvs 1.11.19 and earlier, lib/xtime.h is included twice,
which breaks
compiling on IRIX 5.3.
The following patch prevents this:
--- lib/xtime.h.orig2005-03-01 15:53:11.0 +0100
+++ lib/xtime.h 2005-03-01 15:54:20.0
Derek Price wrote:
Jim.Hyslop wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Dear cvs developers,
|
| for cvs 1.11.19 and earlier, lib/xtime.h is included twice, which
| breaks compiling on IRIX 5.3. The following patch prevents this:
|
| --- lib/xtime.h.orig2005-03-01 15:53:11.0
