Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05.000 and dependencies for downstream maintainers

2015-04-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael Petch mpe...@gnubg.org writes: The new 1.05.000 version of GNUbg has an optional (but highly used feature) that requires a new dependency. We have used random.org as a source of input to GNUbg. This broke at the beginning of the year when that site went to HTTPS over HTTP. In order

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05.000 and dependencies for downstream maintainers

2015-04-26 Thread Michael Petch
On 2015-04-26 8:25 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: libcurl3 development packages no longer exist in Debian because we're trying to get rid of that library. What fails with libcurl4? Can I maybe help with porting this? I'm trying a build right now. I may have been wrong but I thought it failed to

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05.000 and dependencies for downstream maintainers

2015-04-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael Petch mpe...@gnubg.org writes: On 2015-04-26 8:25 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: libcurl3 development packages no longer exist in Debian because we're trying to get rid of that library. What fails with libcurl4? Can I maybe help with porting this? I'm trying a build right now. I may

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05.000 and dependencies for downstream maintainers

2015-04-26 Thread Michael Petch
On 2015-04-26 9:16 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: It ended up building fine with libcurl4-openssl-dev in Debian unstable, and I tested it with random.org and that wroked fine as well, so I went ahead and uploaded that. Thanks for the new release! Thanks for the heads-up. I wanted to be more

[Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05.000 and dependencies for downstream maintainers

2015-04-21 Thread Michael Petch
Howdy, The new 1.05.000 version of GNUbg has an optional (but highly used feature) that requires a new dependency. We have used random.org as a source of input to GNUbg. This broke at the beginning of the year when that site went to HTTPS over HTTP. In order to support this feature going forward