Thanks Philippe,
that was spot on! I already had installed bison via brew but forgotten to put
it into the PATH, so still the macOS version was used.
I also got another compile error:
gnubg.c:4317:38: error: use of undeclared identifier
'rl_filename_quote_characters'; did you mean
Hi Philippe,
thanks for your detailed answer!
> I converted the gnubg and gnubg-nn subdirectories in separate git repos.
> This seemed more natural to have gnubg at the root of its repo.
Yes, separate repositories might also make sense, I don't know what's better.
Having both in one
Thanks for your answer Øystein!
I agree that converting from cvs to git is a good idea. However, GitHub as the
git repo provider may not be the best, and I think that should be discussed. (I
do love GitHub, and I use it for all my personal projects, but there are some
issues ... )
What I
Happy new year to all!
I agree that converting from cvs to git is a good idea. However, GitHub as
the git repo provider may not be the best, and I think that should be
discussed. (I do love GitHub, and I use it for all my personal projects,
but there are some issues ... )
What I rather suggest
Hello Carsten,
I agree that using git would have many advantages. I had tried to
convert the repository (with cvs-fast-export) some time ago, but I'm not
too familiar with git and wasn't sure the result was right. The
documentation of cvs-fast-export gives a lot of warnings... On the other
Hello again,
first I’d like to apologise for sending the same message three times. Should
not happen again.
About a migration to git: I tried two different tools with different results:
a) cvs-fast-export, from https://gitlab.com/esr/cvs-fast-export
b) cvs2git, part of cvs2svn, from