Hi Paul, Simon, Bruno,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:10:53AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 1) Fix the files that forgot to guard inclusion by HAVE_CONFIG_H.
> >This is the first patch.
>
> Actually, I was thinking that we should go the other way,
Hi Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:53:53PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > This patch makes $dry_run obsolete in favor of using $dry only. This
> > way, the repeated and error-prone setting of the latter is eliminated.
>
> Thanks for the patch. I plan to fix this proble
On 2005-09-14, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- libltdl/argz.c1 Jun 2005 19:09:00 - 1.5
> +++ libltdl/argz.c14 Sep 2005 15:56:38 -
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>
> /* Provide our wierdo HAVE_CONFIG_H rvalue for other clients. */
> #if !defined(LTDL) && defined(HAVE
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) Fix the files that forgot to guard inclusion by HAVE_CONFIG_H.
>This is the first patch.
Actually, I was thinking that we should go the other way, and include
config.h unconditionally (except for glibc-derived code). As far as I
know, nobody o
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Thinking out loud, `#if HAVE*' vs. `#ifdef HAVE*' also could be
> uniformized for other values of `*' .. not sure it's worth the effort.
If we were to do this, then towards #if, not towards #ifdef.
$ grep '# *if HAVE_' *.h *.c | wc -l
429
$ grep '# *ifdef HAVE_' *.h *
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> This patch makes $dry_run obsolete in favor of using $dry only. This
> way, the repeated and error-prone setting of the latter is eliminated.
Thanks for the patch. I plan to fix this problem, alongside with the
need for different echo messages in the real case vs. dry-run
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I have added a warning to the headers that config.h needs to be
>included beforehand.
Do we really need this comment? It is better to document this in
doc/gnulib.texi, in my opinion. Then it will cover all files, not
only the one where we rem
Hello Ralf,
> In general, $LIBS needs to be prepended to, not appended, to allow for
> static linking to succeed in the presence of deplibs already in $LIBS.
Thanks for the suggestion. I don't remember having thought about this
issue. But
1) This is not the expected use of AC_LIB_HAVE_LINKFLAGS.
[ replacing bug-libtool with libtool-patches ]
Hi Eric, others,
* Eric Blake wrote on Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 03:36:54PM CEST:
> According to Ralf Wildenhues on 9/9/2005 6:46 AM:
> >
> > I hate runtime checks. This one will mean hopeless complication of
> > things, and worse results for any kind o
Hi Paul,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:21:18AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Would you accept a patch to change all of these to use
> > #ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
> > # include
> > #endif
> >
> > uniformly?
>
> That makes sense to me, yes. We should be co
Hi Bruno, bug-gnulib readers,
In general, $LIBS needs to be prepended to, not appended, to allow for
static linking to succeed in the presence of deplibs already in $LIBS.
With specific libraries, the issue _may_ be different, but only very
rarely so[1]. This is why the patch below handles only
Derek Price wrote:
> Generally, I choose to be pessimistic about test failures when
> cross-compiling. Anyone have an opinion about whether I should be
> pessimistic always or just when the target system name matches gcc's
> list of systems which fail this test?
Generally, I try to use this appro
12 matches
Mail list logo
