On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 23:18, Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org wrote:
Hi Paolo,
On 2010-01-18, in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-01/msg00256.html,
I observed that gnulib's cosl replacement function does not have the
necessary accuracy. This was due to a wrong formula: The
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 23:33, Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org wrote:
Hi Paolo, Eric,
On Cygwin 1.5.x the 'poll' test fails like this:
Unconnected socket test... passed
Connected sockets test... passed
General socket test with fork... passed
Pipe test... failed (expecting POLLHUP after
Hi Bruno,
Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org writes:
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
The ‘-m’ gperf option used by the ‘iconv_open’ module isn’t available in
the ancient gperf 2.7.2:
It is documented in gnulib's DEPENDENCIES file:
Oops, right, I missed that.
What should be done about it?
Run
* Ludovic Courtès wrote on Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:13:45AM CET:
Surprisingly, using BSD make (on FreeBSD) it tries to run gperf, whereas
using GNU make it doesn’t try to (for the same build tree on the same
machine). Ideas?
Without checking the current issue at all, that's almost always due
Hi,
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de writes:
* Ludovic Courtès wrote on Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:13:45AM CET:
Surprisingly, using BSD make (on FreeBSD) it tries to run gperf, whereas
using GNU make it doesn’t try to (for the same build tree on the same
machine). Ideas?
Without
On 03/14/2010 03:15 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Here, the calling convention of providing a string with a size, and the
size must include the trailing NUL byte, is so unusual that the probability
of a mis-use of the API is likely 10% or more.
You can always use assert so that #define NDEBUG would
Hello,
Forwarded is a user report and a proposed patch. OK to apply?
Regards,
Sergey
--- Forwarded message
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:37:00 +0100
From: Petr Sumbera petr.sumb...@sun.com
To: bug-...@gnu.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
-
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
Hello,
Forwarded is a user report and a proposed patch. OK to apply?
Regards,
Sergey
From: Petr Sumbera petr.sumb...@sun.com
To: bug-...@gnu.org
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:37:00 +0100
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
-
Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Jim, Eric,
On MacOS X 10.5, the unlink() and unlinkat() tests fail:
test-unlink.h:49: assertion failed
/bin/sh: line 1: 17670 Abort trap EXEEXT='' srcdir='.'
${dir}$tst
FAIL: test-unlink
test-unlink.h:49: assertion failed
/bin/sh: line 1:
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net ha escrit:
However, it'd be slightly better not to separate the declaration
of p and that first use, so please move it one line higher,
so that the verify stmt is the first in the block.
That's what I thought. Pushed.
Regards,
Sergey
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 03/14/2010 03:15 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Here, the calling convention of providing a string with a size, and the
size must include the trailing NUL byte, is so unusual that the probability
of a mis-use of the API is likely 10% or more.
You can always use assert so
Jim Meyering wrote:
These days, I prefer to use assert(e) over if (!e) abort();.
We used to have to avoid using assert due to portability issues,
but those went away many years ago.
I disagree. The reason why I never use 'assert(e)' is to make sure
the safety checks are actually present.
Bruno Haible wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
These days, I prefer to use assert(e) over if (!e) abort();.
We used to have to avoid using assert due to portability issues,
but those went away many years ago.
I disagree. The reason why I never use 'assert(e)' is to make sure
the safety checks are
Hi Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 05:07:33PM CET:
But this does not fix the problem with coreutils, as long as it has some
source
files in C++. I would therefore find it useful to change lib-ignore.m4 so that
it sets an AC_SUBSTed variable IGNORE_UNUSED_LIBS, and
Hi Jim,
You might just as well define and use your own macro,
#define ASSERT(e) do { if (!(e)) abort (); } while (0)
Oh yes, this one is perfectly fine with me.
you assert a condition rather than testing its negation.
Good point. Yes, I too get confused when reading through a bunch
of
On 03/14/2010 07:14 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Eric,
As I understand it, 'bootstrap' currently updates all submodules when it
wants to update only the gnulib submodule.
Correct.
What about packages that will have
other submodules?
What's the use case for updating some, but not all,
On 03/15/2010 09:20 AM, Bert Wesarg wrote:
Unset GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE environment variable in test
test-vc-list-files-git.sh.
---
diff --git i/tests/test-vc-list-files-git.sh w/tests/test-vc-list-files-git.sh
--- i/tests/test-vc-list-files-git.sh
+++ w/tests/test-vc-list-files-git.sh
On 03/14/2010 06:16 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Jim, Eric,
On MacOS X 10.5, the unlink() and unlinkat() tests fail:
test-unlink.h:49: assertion failed
/bin/sh: line 1: 17670 Abort trap EXEEXT='' srcdir='.'
${dir}$tst
FAIL: test-unlink
Thanks for investigating. This
18 matches
Mail list logo
