On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Hmm, actually struct statfs on linux does have f_frsize, only the
manpage doesn't document it. So correct thing would be to use that,
no?
Here's a patch that allows df(1) to
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Hmm, actually struct statfs on linux does have f_frsize, only the
manpage doesn't document it. So correct thing would be to use that,
no?
Here's a patch
Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Jim,
However, I'm not sure it's portable enough.
Do you know when the f_frsize member began to be useful?
Without knowing that, I cannot judge whether this introduces
a portability problem on older glibc, kernels or file systems.
There are also other platforms than
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Hmm, actually struct statfs on linux does have f_frsize, only the
manpage doesn't document it. So correct thing