Hello Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 05:48:04AM CEST:
I had to autoreconf to get rid of a ton of spurious configure time errors
on my Mac... oddly, the first autoreconf threw up a ton of unset AC_LANG
warnings, but when I reran autorecong to log them for later
I have verified the sleep( ) issue and have checked with some of the
Haiku devs on these issues. All of these are issues with Haiku. I
have opened a handful of tickets in Haiku's trac to cover them:
http://dev.haiku-os.org/ticket/6704
http://dev.haiku-os.org/ticket/6705
On 9 Oct 2010, at 15:13, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Gary,
Hallo Ralf,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 05:48:04AM CEST:
I had to autoreconf to get rid of a ton of spurious configure time errors
on my Mac... oddly, the first autoreconf threw up a ton of unset AC_LANG
Hi Gary,
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Gary V. Vaughan g...@gnu.org wrote:
400 lines of intense shell script later, ...
With only a very cursory look at the implementation - how come you don't
just invoke gl_EARLY and gl_INIT and let the gnulib machinery take care of
including all the
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 02:45:57PM CEST:
On 9 Oct 2010, at 15:13, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 05:48:04AM CEST:
...ah, that's because autoreconf is still running aclocal before
libtoolize,
autoreconf runs
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I've never liked the gnulib 'non-release' policy, and think that maybe git
branching at some reasonably stable point from time to time and apply fixes
to make occasional libposix releases would satisfy my nagging fears
This already happens for a year now. We _are_ making
Hi Eric,
Thanks for this addition.
+struct __time_t_must_be_integral {
+ unsigned int __floating_time_t_unsupported : 2 * ((time_t) 1 / 2 == 0) - 1;
+};
I agree with the expression (personally I would have used (time_t) 0.5 == 0
but that's probably equivalent).
But why use __ as prefix?
Hmm, given Bruno's recent point that C89 didn't require ?: support
in constant expressions
I'm skeptical of that. I can't find my copy of the official C89 standard,
but the draft http://flash-gordon.me.uk/ansi.c.txt says that
constant expressions can contain ?:. In fact, the grammar in
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I've never liked the gnulib 'non-release' policy, and think that maybe git
branching at some reasonably stable point from time to time and apply fixes
to make occasional libposix releases would satisfy
Hi Bruno,
On Oct 10, 2010, at 2:12 AM, Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I've never liked the gnulib 'non-release' policy, and think that maybe git
branching at some reasonably stable point from time to time and apply fixes
to make occasional libposix releases would
10 matches
Mail list logo
