On 07/19/2012 11:55 PM, V S, Nagendra (Nonstop Filesystems Team) wrote:
The coreutils config.hin no more defines any of RAW_DECL_* functions, which
where present in 8.15.
Thanks, good catch. I have pushed the following patch to gnulib to fix this;
it should appear in the next coreutils
On 02/20/2013 05:15 AM, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com ha escrit:
It was just sugestion as tar uses -Werror by default since this commit:
Ouch! A very unfortunate move, I must say.
It works well in other projects, such as coreutils: 'make' uses -Werror
only for
From: Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
Cc: Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org, bug-gnulib@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:50:18 +0100
I think it's a Guile
problem, since from gnulib POV, nothing went wrong in that call.
Yes, that sounds right.
You are both right, yes. Thanks for the help and
Hi Paul,
Developers are assumed to have up-to-date systems where -Werror is
appropriate.
Frankly, I cannot imagine a situation where treaing a warning as an
error can be appropriate. That's why I consider it unfortunate.
I'm surprised you didn't run into this.
That's quite simple.
On 02/20/2013 11:30 AM, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
Hi Paul,
Developers are assumed to have up-to-date systems where -Werror is
appropriate.
Frankly, I cannot imagine a situation where treaing a warning as an
error can be appropriate. That's why I consider it unfortunate.
If code compiles
From: Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
Cc: egg...@cs.ucla.edu, bug-gnulib@gnu.org
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:58:13 +0100
if (full_read (fd, cookie, sizeof cookie) != sizeof cookie
|| full_read (fd, SCM_BYTEVECTOR_CONTENTS (bv),
SCM_BYTEVECTOR_LENGTH (bv)) !=
On Wed 20 Feb 2013 20:02, Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org writes:
Btw, it might be a good idea to provide some application-level
diagnostics in this specific case, since No error, which corresponds
to errno = 0, is not very useful.
I pushed this:
if (full_read (fd, cookie, sizeof cookie) !=
On 07/19/2012 11:55 PM, V S, Nagendra (Nonstop Filesystems Team) wrote:
Find the entire patch we use attached.
Thanks, a brief review of the patch suggests that there
is enough material in it that we should get copyright papers
signed before we can incorporate all those changes
in the GNU
On 07/19/2012 11:55 PM, V S, Nagendra (Nonstop Filesystems Team) wrote:
Find the entire patch we use attached.
Thanks, a brief review of the patch suggests that there is enough material in
it that we should get copyright papers signed before we can incorporate all
those changes in the GNU
