On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 7:32 PM Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> > > I tried to make it clear the last time we discussed this (long ago!)
> > > that I prefer to keep certain comments very near the function
> > > definition (and implementation).
>
> Yes, I sort of remembered this. Therefore I
Hi Jim,
> > I tried to make it clear the last time we discussed this (long ago!)
> > that I prefer to keep certain comments very near the function
> > definition (and implementation).
Yes, I sort of remembered this. Therefore I asked for objections, and put
you in CC.
> > I disagree with the
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 6:07 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
> [I wrote this two or so days ago, but see now somehow I failed to send it]
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 2:58 PM Bruno Haible wrote:
> > It has been reported today that looking at the 'hash' module made Marc guess
> > incorrectly what is desired
[I wrote this two or so days ago, but see now somehow I failed to send it]
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 2:58 PM Bruno Haible wrote:
> It has been reported today that looking at the 'hash' module made Marc guess
> incorrectly what is desired coding style and terminology in Gnulib.
I do not desire to
I wrote 5 days ago:
> Here are proposed patches to modernize the 'hash' and 'xhash' modules in
> this respect.
>
>
> Objections?
There were no objections. So I pushed this.
Bruno
