Re: tests/test-base64.c: executable?

2006-11-28 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Jones) wrote: > > Jim Meyering writes: > >> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Here too. Is this possible to fix without direct access to the CVS > >> > repository? >

Re: Updating FreeBSD port

2006-09-21 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 FYI. My FreeBSD 4.x systems do not have a getopt.h file installed. My FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE i386 system says this: $ ./foo GNU getopt $ POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 ./foo OpenBSD getopt $ -- Mark Eric Blake-1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > It s

inttypes.m4 minor bug fix

2006-09-18 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Thanks, -- Mark 2006-09-18 Mark D. Baushke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * inttypes.m4 (gl_cv_header_working_stdint_h): Avoid 'test: =: unary operator expected' on Solaris 9. (gl_cv_header_inttypes_h): Be consistent in qu

Re: bootstrap: marking gnulib-copied/generated files as such

2006-09-08 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > case $CVS_RSH in > '') export CVS_RSH=ssh;; > esac One of the following would be better, given that not all shells allow assignment on an export command: case $CVS_RSH in '') CVS_RSH=ssh; exp

strnlen.h

2006-09-07 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am confused about why some code does this: #if defined HAVE_DECL_STRNLEN && !HAVE_DECL_STRNLEN and other code does this: #if !HAVE_DECL_GETADDRINFO If you must check for it being defined, wouldn't this form #if !defined HAVE_DECL_STRNLEN || !HAV

Re: new module proposal: split

2006-09-05 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Davide Angelocola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 05 September 2006 22:01, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > Davide Angelocola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm proposing another new module for gnulib: split. > > > > > > The function signature is: > >

Re: printing size_t variables

2006-09-02 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Should we have a gnulib module for *printf that > allows us to use the POSIX-mandated > printf("%zu", (size_t)1) modifier for size_t > variables? Or what is the current recommended > practice for printing size_

Re: compilation flags per object file

2006-08-25 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello Bruno, Mark, > > * Mark D. Baushke wrote on Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 06:01:03PM CEST: > > > > There should be no ambiguity if you add the $(ext) to the > > makefile

Re: compilation flags per object file

2006-08-25 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello Bruno, > > * Bruno Haible wrote on Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 03:07:26PM CEST: > > > > I would love to replace > > > > DEFS += -DLIBDIR=\"$(libdir)\" > > > > with > > > > localcharset_CPPFLA

Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib changes to make it easier for coreutils to use gnulib-tool

2006-08-23 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, I believe that the new openat module needs to depend on lchown. I updated CVS and it didn't pull in the lchown module which lead to a build-break on BSDI BSD/OS. Index: modules/openat =

Re: GNULIB stdint_.h vs windows VC6 compiler

2006-08-21 Thread Mark D. Baushke
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > - Original Message - > From: "Paul Eggert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Dennis Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: ; "Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 9

GNULIB stdint_.h vs windows VC6 compiler

2006-08-21 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks, It seems that the latest stdint_.h file is using contructs that is confusing the windows VC6 compiler used to build the CVS sources. The two problems are .\windows-NT\stdint.h(133) : warning C4067: unexpected tokens following preprocesso

Re: hello 2.1.91 pretest

2006-08-21 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello Mark, > > * Mark D. Baushke wrote on Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:37:06AM CEST: > > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > Suggested patch

Re: hello 2.1.91 pretest

2006-08-21 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Hi Ralf, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello Mark, everyone, > > I'm all for making gnulib-tool portable in practice (and not only in > theory), if only to avoid further such bug reports; but this patch > definitely changes the semantics (the `!' "binds" higher than `||', > if on

Re: hello 2.1.91 pretest

2006-08-21 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >../gnulib/gnulib-tool --update > > > > command from the hello-2.1.91 directory on a Solaris 9 box yeilds a > > syntax error: > > > >

Re: hello 2.1.91 pretest

2006-08-20 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Karl, Of possible interest to GNULIB maintainers, running the ../gnulib/gnulib-tool --update command from the hello-2.1.91 directory on a Solaris 9 box yeilds a syntax error: ../gnulib/gnulib-tool: syntax error at line 634: `}' unexpected U

Re: CVS -D option with time offset

2006-07-31 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Larry Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dirk Stoecker writes: > > > > > cvs diff -D 2006-07-27T18:50:00 > > CVS is interpreting the "T" between the date and time as a military > timezone. You should use a space instead. Hmmm... Yes, it looks lik

Re: cycle-check.h fix imported from coreutils

2006-07-06 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Paul Eggert wrote on Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 09:43:44AM CEST: > > "Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > -lib_SOURCES += cycle-check.c cycle

Re: cycle-check.h fix imported from coreutils

2006-07-03 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Hi Paul, I suspect that you may need something like this or the same-inode.h file will not be added to the tarball with a 'make dist' command. Or at least, it does not seem to do the job with autoconf 2.60. Am I missing something? -- Mark Index: cycle-check =

Re: coreutils merge into gnulib

2006-07-03 Thread Mark D. Baushke
The modules/dirname seems to now depend on xstrndup if gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../intl -Ino/include -g -O2 \ -MT basename.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/basename.Tpo" -c -o basename.o basename.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/basename.Tpo" ".deps/basename.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/basename\ .Tpo"

Re: coreutils merge into gnulib

2006-07-03 Thread Mark D. Baushke
I suspect the following patch was missed... Otherwise same-inode.h may not get into the distribution tarballs of cycle-check users. -- Mark Index: modules/cycle-check === RCS file: /sources/gnulib/gnulib/modules/cycle-check,

Re: simplification rewrite of stdint module installed into gnulib

2006-07-03 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for the bug report. How about this patch instead? > It includes @FULL_PATH_STDINT_H@ first, before ; > this should be a bit safer than including @FULL_PATH_STDINT_H@ twice. Your proposed pat

Re: simplification rewrite of stdint module installed into gnulib

2006-07-03 Thread Mark D. Baushke
[I sent a rather large e-mail message which had another variation of this patch. I think this one is better. The other has not yet appeared on the bug-gnulib or bug-cvs mailing lists.] The following patch seems to be needed due to MacOS X 10.4.6 doing a '#include ' from inside of . -- Mar

stdint_.h vs MacOS X 10.4.6

2006-07-03 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Problem: The /usr/include/stdint.h file on MacOS X, apparently needs to be 'fixed' by generation of the GNULIB stdint_.h file into stdint.h, but includes taken later have a problem in that actually does the #include of for us. This is bad. On MacOS

Re: simplification rewrite of stdint module installed into gnulib

2006-07-02 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> +#if @HAVE_SYS_INTTYPES_H@ && [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ > >>/* Solaris 7 has the types except the *

typo in getaddrinfo.c

2006-06-30 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Fixed in CVS sources. -- Mark 2006-06-30 Jim Hyslop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * getaddrinfo.c: fixed typo Index: getaddrinfo.c === RCS file: /sources/gnulib/gnulib/lib/getaddrinfo.c,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: on IRIX-5.3 & SGI-cc

2006-06-27 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Martin, I have Installed Bruno's latest GNULIB changes into the CVS sources. If there are still problems, it would be good to know what you are seeing out of the 'configure' command... both the output and selected parts of the config.log file.

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: on IRIX-5.3 & SGI-cc

2006-06-27 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Martin, As an FYI, one of the test machines that builds the CVS sources nightly is an SGI IRIX64 running 6.5 (Hmmm... I had thought we also had an SGI IRIX 5.3 out there somewhere, but I must have been confused as I do not see any results from such

Re: stdint module on SGI

2006-06-26 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bruno, I believe your patch has a typo. It uses _c99 instead of __c99 as the symbol that the SGI c99 compiler defines. -- Mark Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mark D. Baushke wrote: > > Yes. I am told th

Re: stdint module on SGI

2006-06-26 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mark D. Baushke wrote: > > In fact, the SGI > > IRIX 5.3 c99 compiler does have do > > this. When c89 is used, the file is not included, > > but all of the needed types are defined. > > Let me try to recap it

Re: stdint module on SGI

2006-06-23 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Hi Bruno, The CVS forked version is getting closer to the GNULIB version. (See below). Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mark D. Baushke wrote: > > The following two patches take a closer step toward making things work > > under the default c89 compiler on SGI b

Re: on IRIX-5.3 & SGI-cc

2006-06-23 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marti, I have committed a change to CVS top-of-tree that may help you. Does your system protect against duplication of types out of ? -- Mark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEnD0ZCg7APGsDnFERAjXSAJ9

Re: on IRIX-5.3 & SGI-cc

2006-06-23 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Hi Martin, The CVS project has forked from the GNULIB project slightly for the stdint stuff as I have not seen any commit to gnulib to support the SGI compilation problems we had observed. I have hopes that they will either adopt our changes or equivalent changes so that we can once more use their

stdint module

2006-06-22 Thread Mark D. Baushke
with just . Reported by "Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. * m4/stdint.h: Ditto. Index: lib/stdint_.h === RCS file: /sources/gnulib/gnulib/lib/stdint_.h,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -p -r1.17 s

stdint module on SGI

2006-06-21 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Hi Bruno, The following two patches take a closer step toward making things work under the default c89 compiler on SGI boxes. All files that #include still get warnings like this one: cc-1035 cc: WARNING File = /usr/include/stdint.h, Line = 5 #error directive: This header file is to be used

Re: stdint vs cycle-check.h

2006-06-21 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Larry Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Paul Eggert writes: > > > > For cycle-check.h I'd think this wouldn't be a problem, since > > cycle-check.h uses this Autoconf-recommended sequence: > > > > # if HAVE_INTTYPES_H > > # include > > # endif >

Re: stdint vs cycle-check.h

2006-06-20 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The HAVE_STDINT_H is defined, even though it is useless and there is an > > stdint.h which is generated

Re: stdint vs cycle-check.h

2006-06-20 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > is it desirable to make those modules depend on stdint.m4 and avoid the > > HAVE_STDINT_H macro? > > Yes,

stdint vs cycle-check.h

2006-06-20 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bruno & Jim, A system without an file, will have the stdint_.h turned into a valid one. However, the HAVE_STDINT_H will not be defined. This causes problems with files like cycle-check.h which does: # if HAVE_STDINT_H # include # endif Similar

alloca_.h suggested change

2006-06-19 Thread Mark D. Baushke
On FreeBSD 6.1, the file /usr/include/stdlib.h has the following on lines 219 through 233 inclusive: /* * The alloca() function can't be implemented in C, and on some * platforms it can't be implemented at all as a callable function. * The GNU C compiler provides a built-in alloca() which we ca

Re: stdint tweak

2006-06-19 Thread Mark D. Baushke
included from the generated stdint.h file. An alternative approach would be to change how gl_FULL_HEADER_PATH works, in which case the define geneated for the confdefs.h file will need to avoid duplication of the angle brackets. Thanks, -- Mark 2006-06-19 Mark D. Baushke <[EM

Re: stdint module rewrite (was: Re: Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.)

2006-06-16 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Mark, > > > I see the following: > > > > #if 0 > > # ifndef UINT_FAST16_MAX > > # if < 32 > > # define UINT_FAST16_MAX (((1 << ( - 1)) - 1) * 2 + 1) > > # else > > # define UINT_FAST16_MAX (((1U

Re: stdint module rewrite (was: Re: Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.)

2006-06-16 Thread Mark D. Baushke
UINT64_MAX # else # define UINT_FAST16_MAX UINT32_MAX # endif #endif I am not at all certain that all compilers will ignore illegal preprocessor expressions in a '#if 0' block. So, should some other expression for '# if < 32' be generated? -- Mark Bruno Haible

Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: [Cvs-test-results] Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.

2006-06-15 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm getting a bit lost with info about both versus > , but does the following patch fix the problem? This does not fix the problem as the AC_CACHE_VAL(gl_cvs_header_stdint_h) is interfering with the test due

Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: [Cvs-test-results] Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.

2006-06-15 Thread Mark D. Baushke
[Sorry about sending a reverse patch the first time around...] Hi Folks, The CVS project found a need to add the following patch to lib/strtoimax.c in order to get compilation on Windows to work. The basic problem is that there is an __int64 type and three conversion functions: char * _i64toa(_

Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: [Cvs-test-results] Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.

2006-06-15 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Hi Folks, The CVS project found a need to add the following patch to lib/strtoimax.c in order to get compilation on Windows to work. The basic problem is that there is an __int64 type and three conversion functions: char * _i64toa(__int64, char *, int); char * _ui64toa(unsigned __int64, char *,

Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: [Cvs-test-results] Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.

2006-06-11 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The current test that checks for the existence of isn't > > sufficient on SGI when using the compiler in (its default?) C89 mode, > > because the SGI compil

Re: regex module broken

2006-04-13 Thread Mark D. Baushke
TECTED]> > > * regcomp.c (init_dfa): Don't use wchar_t or wctype_t if RE_ENABLE_I18N > is not defined. Problem reported by Mark D. Baushke via Derek R. Price. > > --- lib/regcomp.c 10 Apr 2006 19:15:08 - 1.7 > +++ lib/regcomp.c 13 Apr 2006 22:11:

Re: PATCH to stdint_.h for OpenBSD Sparc64

2006-03-27 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark D. Baushke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Folks, > > For this is the bug report: > <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=15040> > CVS needs the following patch applied to GNULIB/lib/stdl

PATCH to stdint_.h for OpenBSD Sparc64

2006-03-27 Thread Mark D. Baushke
ed by both and . Alex has verified that the patch below fixes his problem building CVS on his OpenBSD box. Thanks, -- Mark 2006-03-26 Mark D. Baushke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * stdint_.h: Protect against OpenBSD integer types from .

GNULIB stdint_.h vs OpenBSD Sparc64

2006-03-18 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, It appears that the GNULIB stdint_h.m4 (serial 5) which CVS 1.12 (trunk) is using is not properly protecting against the Exact-width integer types being present in which may be included from among other places. This is the full bug repor

Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib/gnulib-tool shell quoting problem for Solaris /bin/sh

2006-01-25 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mark D. Baushke wrote: > > > I'm trying this patch. Does it work for you? > > > > Yes. > > Thanks. I've committed the fix. > > > | If argume

Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib/gnulib-tool shell quoting problem for Solaris /bin/sh

2006-01-25 Thread Mark D. Baushke
standard: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/trap.html#tag_04_146 So, I will let you folks determine the fix to apply. Thank you, -- Mark > > > 2006-01-25 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * gnulib-tool (func_import): Use "trap :&

openat-priv.h needs intprops.h

2006-01-24 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Hi Jim, The openat provided file openat-priv.h tries to include "intprops.h" but that file is not listed in the modules/openat file as a dependency. The following patch seems to fix this problem for me. There is probably a better way to do it, but I will leave that to you. Thanks!

gnulib/gnulib-tool shell quoting problem for Solaris /bin/sh

2006-01-24 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Greetings, While trying to run ../gnulib/gnulib-tool on a Solaris 9 system I have run into problems when /bin/sh is used. The workaround appears to be to do /bin/bash ../gnulib/gnulib-tool --import which seems to avoid the problem (/bin/bash is a 2.05 version). I am getting these two erro

Re: new module lib-ignore; new section build_lib in MODULES.html

2006-01-18 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Quoting Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > It appears that -Xlinker is supported only by gcc, and -Wl by other > > compilers too? > > Sorry, I had never heard of -Wl. Do you know whether GCC has > supp

Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t

2006-01-09 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't understand why ((size_t)-1) is considered C99 specific. You are correct. It is not C99 specific. I was quoting the C99 standard which Bruno referenced to be sure everyone was on the same page because I

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t

2006-01-09 Thread Mark D. Baushke
> > > * lib/stdint_.h (intmax_t) [defined intmax_t]: Do not declare. > > (uintmax_t) [defined uintmax_t]: Do not declare. > > (SIZE_MAX) [defined SIZE_MAX]: Do not define. > > This works around a problem if intmax_t.m4 and/or uintmax_t.m4 >

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t

2006-01-09 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mark D. Baushke wrote on 2005-11-15: > > it would be more portable to use this: > > > > #ifndef SIZE_MAX > > # define SIZE_MAX ((size_t)-1) > > #endif

Re: Use of bison

2005-12-30 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Hi Eric, Francesco Montorsi on 12/27/2005 11:42 AM wrote: > PS: I've recently installed SuSE and I've found > that the configure script of coreutils doesn't > check for 'bison' presence: on that distro, it > was missing and it gave me problems later with > "make". I think adding a check for 'biso

Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t

2005-11-27 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Hi Paul, Did Bruno ever give you his opinion for this fix? Thanks, -- Mark Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There is one remaining interaction with stdint_.h and config.h &g

Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t

2005-11-15 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Mark D. Baushke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There is one remaining interaction with stdint_.h and config.h > > which arises from m4/size_max.m4 > > >

Re: stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t

2005-11-14 Thread Mark D. Baushke
ntmax_t]: Do not declare. > (uintmax_t) [defined uintmax_t]: Do not declare. > This works around a problem if intmax_t.m4 and/or uintmax_t.m4 > are also used. Problem reported by Mark D. Baushke. > > --- stdint_.h.~1.7.~ 2005-05-23 03:22:39.0 -0700 > +++ std

stdint_.h vs intmax_t & uintmax_t

2005-11-14 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have run into a quirk of GNULIB building CVS on a FreeBSD 4.2 host. It seems that CVS is using m4/intmax.m4 which generate these lines into the config.h file: /* Define if you have the 'uintmax_t' type in or . */ /* The size of a `intmax_t', as co

gnulib/lib/getaddrinfo.h needs a #include

2005-10-04 Thread Mark D. Baushke
This compilation problem of lib/cannon-host.c on FreeBSD 4.10-BETA or 4.11 results when lib/getaddrinfo.h does not do a #include before the #include ... The change was between 1.5 and 1.6 of /cvsroot/gnulib/gnulib/lib/getaddrinfo.h,v with the following log message: 2005-10-01 Simon Josefsson

Re: lgpl compatible files archive?

2005-07-04 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I found it helped to attack the problem one module at a time, > > carefully considering the details. Exactly which modules do you need > > which are under the

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: [PATCH] mmap-anon.m4: use proper macro & condition

2005-05-02 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Many thanks to Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> who committed the patch to gl_FUNC_MMAP_ANON to check for message, not for MAP_ANON. I have updated the feature branch of CVS on cvshome.org to use the new version of the m4/mmap-anon.m4 file. E

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: [PATCH] mmap-anon.m4: use proper macro & condition

2005-05-01 Thread Mark D. Baushke
Hi Folks, I have not seen any discussion or commit on this patch suggested by Moriyoshi Koizumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (originally submitted to the bug-cvs list and forwarded by me) which allows MacOS X (10.2.x and 10.3.x) to properly be able to '#define HAVE_MAP_ANONYMOUS 1' along with '#define MAP_

[bug-gnulib] Re: [PATCH] mmap-anon.m4: use proper macro & condition

2005-04-23 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moriyoshi Koizumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm, seems the attachments were stripped. I placed them on > > http://www.voltex.jp/patches/cvs-1.12.12-mmap-anon-20050424.patch.diff.gz > http://www.voltex.jp/patches/cvs-1.12.12-pam-header-20050424-pa