Paul Eggert wrote:
On 07/26/2012 01:49 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
can we always count on the vc-dwim boilerplate to
be the same to automatically prune it from gitlog-to-changelog?
Probably not, but we can keep a catalog of all of them,
surely, assuming this problem persists indefinitely,
which I
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net ha escrit:
(BTW, the second sentence seems incorrect:
I saw no makefile rule for ChangeLog in tar.)
It is in Make.rules, which is imported from Paxutils.
Regards,
Sergey
On 07/27/2012 01:20 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
How about just not writing the boilerplate text
to ChangeLog when that file already exists?
Thanks, I installed that in your name.
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net ha escrit:
(BTW, the second sentence seems incorrect:
I saw no makefile rule for ChangeLog in tar.)
It is in Make.rules, which is imported from Paxutils.
Thanks for the info.
This particular working directory had an old cvs-based
[adding Jim, as author of vc-dwim; and gnulib, as owner of
gitlog-to-changelog]
On 07/26/2012 12:50 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 07/26/2012 10:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
You'll need to install a followup to amend the
generated ChangeLog when running gitlog-to-changelog (see how coreutils
uses
On 07/26/2012 01:49 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
can we always count on the vc-dwim boilerplate to
be the same to automatically prune it from gitlog-to-changelog?
Probably not, but we can keep a catalog of all of them,
surely, assuming this problem persists indefinitely,
which I hope it doesn't.
