>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] fix descriptions for AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT
>>
[...]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pádraig Brady
>
> Makes sense to me.
> But see a few minor comments below.
But you missed the comments below :)
Please fix them (see below).
Thanks,
Alex
[...]
>&g
On 3/14/22 19:02, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 14/03/2022 13:24, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
>> On 3/10/22 14:46, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> Subject: [PATCH] fix descriptions for AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT
>>>
>>> Don't mention AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT for fstatat
AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT flag before 4.11
fstatat() did imply AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT since 4.11
The attached patch clarifies this is the fstatat and statx man pages.
sorry for the confusion,
Pádraig
---
Subject: [PATCH] fix descriptions for AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT
Don't mention AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT for fstatat.2
a
ly AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT from 2.6.38 -> 4.11
> I'm not sure it even honored the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT flag before 4.11
> fstatat() did imply AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT since 4.11
>
> The attached patch clarifies this is the fstatat and statx man pages.
>
> sorry for the confusion,
> Pádr
On 3/10/22 11:39, Pádraig Brady wrote:
The changes are a net improvement I think since fewer interfaces are used.
I would remove the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT parameters to fstatat() though,
since they're redundant it seems, and would only result in confusion
if the patch is applied to remove that flag f
On 10/03/2022 19:29, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 3/10/22 05:46, Pádraig Brady wrote:
After looking at the kernel code, it seems that:
fstatat() did _not_ imply AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT from 2.6.38 -> 4.11
I'm not sure it even honored the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT flag before 4.11
fstatat() did imply AT_NO_
On 3/10/22 05:46, Pádraig Brady wrote:
After looking at the kernel code, it seems that:
fstatat() did _not_ imply AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT from 2.6.38 -> 4.11
I'm not sure it even honored the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT flag before 4.11
fstatat() did imply AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT since 4.11
Ouch, so this whole t
r the confusion,
PádraigFrom d5c356f18b18cceb245ae9df175322760f32fb2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?=
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:37:11 +
Subject: [PATCH] fix descriptions for AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT
Don't mention AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT for fstatat.2
as it's implied s
