On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 14:58 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
I don't think Chinese users will find it nice if you exclude them from
correct functioning of your program because of performance or library
size.
I don't think you are qualified to decide in place
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 13:38 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
However, if we have a platform missing strcasestr, then using
c_strcasestr as the substitute implementation is probably okay, because
that platform would probably be broken in other areas, such as locale
Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
I don't think Chinese users will find it nice if you exclude them from
correct functioning of your program because of performance or library
size.
I don't think you are qualified to decide in place of the application
developer whether the application should
Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
The c-ctype, c-strcase, c-strcasestr and c-strstr modules seem only to
implement their replacement functions using a c_ prefix.
However, there is no autoconf test implemented by these modules that
redefine the original function (in case it is missing) to point to
