Re: [PATCH 0/1] old-fashioned suffix rules cannot have any prerequisites

2020-04-02 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 21:00:15 -0400 Paul Smith wrote: > > > > > But % pattern rules are GNU make specific syntax, since this syntax > > is not specified by POSIX [1]. I fear that I'll have to use a more > > complicated fix... > > Correct, you cannot use pattern rules in portable makefiles.

Re: [PATCH 0/1] old-fashioned suffix rules cannot have any prerequisites

2020-04-01 Thread Paul Smith
Sorry, somehow the original email went by me. On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 02:01 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Petr Ovtchenkov wrote in > > > > Template po/Makefile.in.in use old-fashioned suffix rules > > for generating .gmo. But

Re: [PATCH 0/1] old-fashioned suffix rules cannot have any prerequisites

2020-04-01 Thread Bruno Haible
[CCing bug-gettext, because po/Makefile.in.in comes from GNU gettext.] Petr Ovtchenkov wrote in > Template po/Makefile.in.in use old-fashioned suffix rules > for generating .gmo. But this rules do not allow any prerequisites.