Re: coreutils-6.0 on BeOS (6)

2006-08-28 Thread Bruno Haible
Simon Josefsson wrote: The reason is that BeOS does not have PF_INET, only AF_INET, but usually they have the same values. Also it doesn't have PF_UNSPEC. Does it AF_UNSPEC? Did you grep the entire /usr/include tree to find PF_INET or PF_UNSPEC? Maybe they are in some non-standard

Re: coreutils-6.0 on BeOS (6)

2006-08-28 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Simon Josefsson wrote: The reason is that BeOS does not have PF_INET, only AF_INET, but usually they have the same values. Also it doesn't have PF_UNSPEC. Does it AF_UNSPEC? Did you grep the entire /usr/include tree to find PF_INET or PF_UNSPEC?

Re: coreutils-6.0 on BeOS (6)

2006-08-23 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The reason is that BeOS does not have PF_INET, only AF_INET, but usually they have the same values. Also it doesn't have PF_UNSPEC. Does it AF_UNSPEC? Did you grep the entire /usr/include tree to find PF_INET or PF_UNSPEC? Maybe they are in some

coreutils-6.0 on BeOS (6)

2006-08-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Simon, Compiling coreutils-6.0 on BeOS gives this: source='getaddrinfo.c' object='getaddrinfo.o' libtool=no \ DEPDIR=.deps depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../build-aux/depcomp \ gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLIBDIR=\/boot/home/config/lib\ -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I. -Wall -I/boot/home/config/include -g -O2 -c