[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Blake) wrote:
So experience in gnulib has shown that slightly different semantics,
with dir_name that always mallocs, and (when my patch from a
month ago is approved) base_name that mallocs and last_component
As far as I know, we're still waiting for confirmation from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 12/23/2005 5:05 AM:
Eric Blake wrote:
So experience in gnulib has shown that slightly different semantics,
with dir_name that always mallocs, and (when my patch from a
month ago is approved) base_name that mallocs and
The gl_DIRNAME macro (in dirname.m4) calls AC_LIBOBJ([dirname])
unconditionally, without testing for a working dirname implementation.
Also, the dirname module provides a basename implementation, but there
is no basename.m4 that would test for this specific function.
I need to provide a
