Re: regex problems

2005-08-20 Thread Paul Eggert
Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would you please also consider the 2 patches in > Thanks for reporting those. I installed the first patch as I described earlier. The second patch is not correct, though, so I installed the fo

Re: regex problems

2005-08-20 Thread Paul Eggert
Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would you please also consider the 2 patches in > OK, I installed the first patch, as follows: 2005-08-20 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * config/srclist.txt: Add glibc bug 1226.

Re: regex problems

2005-08-16 Thread Sam Steingold
> * Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-15 17:06:58 -0700]: > > Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> This patch should work. No version of g++ in the 3.2.*, 3.3.*, 3.4.*, >> 4.0.[01] series supports the [__restrict] syntax. > > Thanks. I installed that patch, Thanks. Would you plea

Re: [bug-gnulib] regex problems

2005-08-15 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This patch should work. No version of g++ in the 3.2.*, 3.3.*, 3.4.*, > 4.0.[01] series supports the [__restrict] syntax. Thanks. I installed that patch, along with the corresponding change to srclist.txt, and some commentary improvements there. I also

Re: regex problems

2005-08-05 Thread Sam Steingold
> * Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-04 13:22:12 +0200]: > > Sam Steingold wrote: >> > This patch should work. ... >> >> will you check this into the gnulib CVS? > > I'm waiting for other people's opinion, especially Paul Eggert's one. > (The regex module is owned by "all".) here are 2 mo

Re: [bug-gnulib] regex problems

2005-08-04 Thread Sam Steingold
> * Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-04 13:22:12 +0200]: > > Sam Steingold wrote: > >> > Does the definition of AC_CHECK_HEADERS_ONCE also find its way into >> > the aclocal.m4 file? ... >> no, aclocal.m4 does not have the definition. > That's the problem. Fix that, and it will work. well

Re: [bug-gnulib] regex problems

2005-08-04 Thread Bruno Haible
Sam Steingold wrote: > > This patch should work. ... > > will you check this into the gnulib CVS? I'm waiting for other people's opinion, especially Paul Eggert's one. (The regex module is owned by "all".) > > Does the definition of AC_CHECK_HEADERS_ONCE also find its way into > > the aclocal.m4

Re: [bug-gnulib] regex problems

2005-08-03 Thread Sam Steingold
> * Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-03 22:42:04 +0200]: > > Sam Steingold wrote: >> when trying to upgrade to the latest gnulib regexp, I encountered the >> following problems: >> >> 1. g++ cannot compile regexp: >> >> ./regex.h:569: error: expected primary-expression before "__restrict__

Re: [bug-gnulib] regex problems

2005-08-03 Thread Bruno Haible
Sam Steingold wrote: > when trying to upgrade to the latest gnulib regexp, I encountered the > following problems: > > 1. g++ cannot compile regexp: > > ./regex.h:569: error: expected primary-expression before "__restrict__" > ./regex.h:569: error: expected `]' before "__restrict__" > ./regex.h:569

regex problems

2005-08-03 Thread Sam Steingold
when trying to upgrade to the latest gnulib regexp, I encountered the following problems: 1. g++ cannot compile regexp: ./regex.h:569: error: expected primary-expression before "__restrict__" ./regex.h:569: error: expected `]' before "__restrict__" ./regex.h:569: error: expected `,' or `...' befo