Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul, is this ok to commit?
Yes, that looks good to me; thanks.
Hi,
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> HP-UX10 has:
> int gmtime_r(const time_t *timer, struct tm *result);
> int localtime_r(const time_t *timer, struct tm *result);
>
> Which is, as you know, not standards conforming.
>
> However, compiling the test case for reentrant time functions on
> hpux10 with its
Hi,
HP-UX10 has:
int gmtime_r(const time_t *timer, struct tm *result);
int localtime_r(const time_t *timer, struct tm *result);
Which is, as you know, not standards conforming.
However, compiling the test case for reentrant time functions on
hpux10 with its native cc and -Ae results in a compile
(I have moved the discussion to the gnulib mailing list; bug-coreutils
is BCC'ed)
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No.
I note your subsequent mail, and yes, I was indeed thinking about
oversized allocations.
> This function is intended to be usable from
