[Re-adding bug-gnulib in CC. This is a reply to a reply to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2009-01/msg00313.html.]
Hi Gary,
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
2009/1/24 Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
!THE FOLLOWING IS A REGRESSION OVER m4-1.4.12, WHICH COMPILES AND
2009/1/24 Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11-hpc m4 tests pass, gnulib fails: test-c-stack.sh
./test-c-stack.sh[7]: 1752 Memory fault(coredump)
FAIL: test-c-stack.sh
I reproduce this on HP-UX 11.11, without libsigsegv.
I'm committing the change
2009/2/19 Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org:
[Re-adding bug-gnulib in CC. This is a reply to a reply to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2009-01/msg00313.html.]
Thanks, I'm currently catching up with over 4 months of mailing lists,
and probably not paying as much attention to those
Hi,
attached is a patch for a new module 'safe-alloc'. The module originated
with libvirt[1] and was originally written by Dan Berrange. I touched it
up for inclusion into gnulib. I've found them useful for some of my
projects, and thought that putting them into gnulib would be much better
than
Hi David,
Thanks for proposing such a nice module! Uses of malloc/realloc really
need a lot of attention and care, and I've also produced bug #7 (memory
leak if realloc fails) more than once.
For a module as basic as this one, in gnulib, I think it's essential that the
copyright is with the FSF.
Karl Berry wrote:
In compiling the binaries for TeX Live, where we try to use fairly old
compilers and systems, the only platform which had problems with
decl-after-stmt was v5 of the IBM C compiler for AIX 4.3. There are
various reasons why the person who does those builds doesn't want to use
Bruno Haible wrote:
For a module as basic as this one, in gnulib, I think it's essential that the
copyright is with the FSF. Can you arrange with Daniel Berrange and/or his
employer (Red Hat) that the copyright gets assigned?
Please excuse my (mostly-ignorant) intrusion, but are you sure Red
Please excuse my (mostly-ignorant) intrusion, but are you sure Red Hat
does not already have an assignment on file? (I'm sure I heard somewhere
that they do at least for certain GNU projects...)
Indeed, Red Hat does, as an employer. I have been told that RH
employees don't even
Karl Berry wrote:
Please excuse my (mostly-ignorant) intrusion, but are you sure Red Hat
does not already have an assignment on file? (I'm sure I heard somewhere
that they do at least for certain GNU projects...)
Indeed, Red Hat does, as an employer. I have been told that RH
Have you built gcc on AIX 4.x?
Personally? Not recently. I've done so in the past.
The person who builds the AIX binaries for TL is Vladimir Volovich. As
I recall, vvv told me that he did have gcc on AIX, but that the
resulting binaries were both slower and bigger than the IBM C compiler
Karl Berry wrote:
Anyway, my point here was merely that decl-after-stmt was not an
unreasonable assumption for GNU packages.
I guess that depends on your definition of portable, then. I tend to
define that as conforms-to-POSIX-and-C89. YMMV.
Not that there is any great need to continue this
Hi Bruno,
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:59 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
Thanks for proposing such a nice module!
All glory for this lies with Dan (and Jim Meyering for doing a
preliminary review)
For a module as basic as this one, in gnulib, I think it's essential that the
copyright is with the
12 matches
Mail list logo