Ørjan Malde wrote:
> Yes, although there is one exception which is realpath,
> as the midipix framework provides a syscall and realpath wrapper that
> overrides musl's which does behave correctly.
But you haven't extended the test to include the test code that is
currently '#ifdef __linux__'. You'
Ørjan Malde wrote:
> the runtime components contain extra checks to align the behavior
> with linux's.
So, this justifies this patch (according to your statement that these
test programs work).
2023-02-17 Bruno Haible
Improve cross-compilation for midipix.
Reported by Ørjan M
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, February 17th, 2023 at 4:31 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Ørjan Malde wrote:
>
> > > So, will config.sub stay as it is, and the pattern to check for is
> > > midipix* ?
> >
> > The triplet naming is out of my control, it's integrated with tools new
> >
Ørjan Malde wrote:
> > So, will config.sub stay as it is, and the pattern to check for is midipix*
> > ?
> >
>
> The triplet naming is out of my control, it's integrated with tools new
> and existing, and personally I like it the way it is.
OK, then the pattern is midipix*.
I'm committing th
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, February 16th, 2023 at 10:55 PM, Bruno Haible
wrote:
> Ørjan Malde wrote:
>
> > I had no intention of hiding my name:-)
>
>
> OK, we're past step 1 :)
>
> > we rely on musl for the C library, theoretically another libc could be
> > ported
> > b
Ørjan Malde wrote:
> I had no intention of hiding my name:-)
OK, we're past step 1 :)
> we rely on musl for the C library, theoretically another libc could be ported
> but I don't see that happening.
OK, so it will be correct to use the musl cross-compilation guesses for
non-system-call related
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, February 15th, 2023 at 11:57 PM, Ørjan Malde wrote:
> --- Original Message ---
> On Wednesday, February 15th, 2023 at 11:16 PM, Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Red wrote:
> >
> > > * m4/calloc.m4: When cross
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, February 15th, 2023 at 11:16 PM, Bruno Haible
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Red wrote:
>
> > * m4/calloc.m4: When cross-compiling, use the
> > result from native compilation.
> > * m4/canonicalize.m4: Likewise.
> > ...
>
>
> 1) First, a formal remark. I'm n
Hi,
Red wrote:
> * m4/calloc.m4: When cross-compiling, use the
> result from native compilation.
> * m4/canonicalize.m4: Likewise.
> ...
1) First, a formal remark. I'm not very inclined to take patch contributions
from a pseudonymial identity.
- Whoever contributes a patch should take responsi
* m4/calloc.m4: When cross-compiling, use the
result from native compilation.
* m4/canonicalize.m4: Likewise.
* m4/cbrtl.m4: Likewise.
* m4/ceil.m4: Likewise.
* m4/ceilf.m4: Likewise.
* m4/ceill.m4: Likewise.
* m4/chmod.m4: Likewise.
* m4/d-ino.m4: Likewise.
* m4/exp2l.m4: Likewise.
* m4/expm1.m4:
10 matches
Mail list logo
