Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> For GCC one can use nested functions, but how can
> 'partial_function_last' be implemented in ISO C?
It can be implemented for each CPU type and ABI. But this is OK since the
number of CPU types are hardly increasing nowadays.
It cannot be implemented in ISO C.
>
Hi Bruno,
Am Fr., 10. Juli 2020 um 20:38 Uhr schrieb Bruno Haible :
> OK. Then let's take the problem seriously.
If your solution can be implemented portable, that will be the best
solution by far.
For GCC one can use nested functions, but how can
'partial_function_last' be implemented in ISO
Hi Marc,
> > > a number of modules (like the hash module or the list module) allow
> > > the user to specify callbacks (e.g. a comparison function).
> > > Unfortunately, these procedures do not take a context parameter, which
> > > can be a problem because C lacks closures.
> >
> > Is this a
Hi Bruno,
Am Do., 9. Juli 2020 um 22:16 Uhr schrieb Bruno Haible :
> > a number of modules (like the hash module or the list module) allow
> > the user to specify callbacks (e.g. a comparison function).
> > Unfortunately, these procedures do not take a context parameter, which
> > can be a
Hi Marc,
> a number of modules (like the hash module or the list module) allow
> the user to specify callbacks (e.g. a comparison function).
> Unfortunately, these procedures do not take a context parameter, which
> can be a problem because C lacks closures.
Is this a practical, actual problem,
Hi,
a number of modules (like the hash module or the list module) allow
the user to specify callbacks (e.g. a comparison function).
Unfortunately, these procedures do not take a context parameter, which
can be a problem because C lacks closures.
The original qsort function in stdlib.h has the
