Re: const-correctness fixes for regex

2005-09-01 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> A week or so ago, I stumbled across one interface that was missing a >> `const' attribute on a parameter, then dug up a few more. Paul, let me >> know when you reach a point at which my checking this in won't inte

Re: const-correctness fixes for regex

2005-08-31 Thread Paul Eggert
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A week or so ago, I stumbled across one interface that was missing a > `const' attribute on a parameter, then dug up a few more. Paul, let me > know when you reach a point at which my checking this in won't interfere. It's easier for me if I just get it

const-correctness fixes for regex

2005-08-31 Thread Jim Meyering
A week or so ago, I stumbled across one interface that was missing a `const' attribute on a parameter, then dug up a few more. Paul, let me know when you reach a point at which my checking this in won't interfere. Index: regcomp.c =